Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers will 100% trade up and draft a QB


GOAT
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Ugh, yeah, not going to happen.  That's a fantasy football move.

Why wouldnt it? Gives carolina the most leverage, and #3 gives Chicago even more leverage as well. They dont even have to stop trading down at #3 if they create a bidding war for the #3 QB in the draft. They just want the best defensive player while collecting picks.

 

i'll admit the hardest part of this scenario to rectify is the simple desire of the Cardinals to move down to the #9 pick. 
 

I also dont see Indy having the stomach to trade multiple first instead of sitting at #4. Carolina clearly has the desire to move up, the official channels have been trying to get fans prepped for a trade up.

Edited by thunderraiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thunderraiden said:

Why wouldnt it? Gives carolina the most leverage, and #3 gives Chicago even more leverage as well. They dont even have to stop trading down at #3 if they create a bidding war for the #3 QB in the draft. They just want the best defensive player while collecting picks.

 

i'll admit the hardest part of this scenario to rectify is the simple desire of the Cardinals to move down to the #9 pick. 
 

I also dont see Indy having the stomach to trade multiple first instead of sitting at #4 which Carolina has.

Because multiple trades like that doesn't happen.  Because you are assuming that it will be that easy with everyone interested in trading around.  That's just fantasy thinking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

 

What if we offer them 3 1st?

 

They can ignore it and get the player that they want and pick up an additional 1st and a couple other picks if they choose. If Anderson or Carter is "their guy", then they will only move as far as they can to guarantee they still get one or the other. Sure they don't add a 25' 1st, but they get the player they wanted and some. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

This is where I think Burns comes into play.

 

Burns/2 1st beats anybody offer.

 

You cannot say that. You do not know what other teams are willing to offer.  The Bears want draft picks and a lot of them. The want more than 3 1sts my friend.  You will need to throw in a few 2nds as well just to join the conversation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

You cannot say that. You do not know what other teams are willing to offer.  The Bears want draft picks and a lot of them. The want more than 3 1sts my friend.  You will need to throw in a few 2nds as well just to join the conversation. 

Call me crazy, but my personal opinion is to go from 9 to 1 will take 3 1sts, (2) 2nds this year, and 2 future 3rds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GOAT said:

Bet your savings on it, bet the house on it. 

Stop making threads about Carr, Lamar, Fields.

They've gathered some picks for ammo. 

Our GM is a trade happy wheel and dealer.

Our owner is a trigger pulling risk taker.

Our staff is designed to draft and develop a QB.

Nobody has mentioned that the guys on our roster are the answer.

The team knows what the fans want, and they know the time is now.

The social media has constant content on QB prospects and mock drafts. They always tip their hand.

Who are they trading up for and which spot? What will they give up? Nobody knows yet. But it is 100% happening. I have never been more confident about their intentions to do something. 

The sooner you realize this is 100% happening, the sooner we can move on from discussing retreads, the sooner we can stop whining about the pros and cons of doing this.

It is happening, let it happen. Get ready. No I will not charge you for the gambling advice. Lock of the century boys.

 

Ceo Happening GIF by Kuali

 

Blake Griffin and Ryan Kalil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...