Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Combine Drills: Quarterback Day


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

@LinvilleGorgeright now on NFL+ Kurt Warner and Steve Smith Sr. are talking about how inconsistent Stetson has done today... so Id like to understand where you are seeing he is the best thrower by a wide margin...

They have used descriptors like "Robotic" "Cutting off his drop back" "drifts into his throws" (that leads to sacks) and "would like to see more consistency with his ball placement"

 

extra note: Kuurt Warner is a big fan of Stet.... and SS sr. is giving him poo for it.

 

The ball shows up when and where it's supposed to be. "Robotic" isn't a valid criticism IMO. I don't care what the guy looks like while he's doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

I mean I wouldn’t even draft Stetson. I’m just acknowledging he has been the most consistent kid today so far throwing to his WRs in stride. Before this last drill. This last one was brutal. 

His opening drill was rough, second to last (His first he cut his drop back in half and threw the ball early and short. Kurt Warner was "disapointed" and then SSsr made fun of him.) and the last one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

The ball shows up when and where it's supposed to be. "Robotic" isn't a valid criticism IMO. I don't care what the guy looks like while he's doing it.

They were saying robotic bc of how he drops back and works into his throw. His timing is off because of it. It isnt "how he looks" its the robotic process of getting through his drop back and step into the throw. 

 

That is a HUGE deal in the NFL because timing is everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Again, why is your business?

Trying to determine if this is going to be some long term thing where it would be best to just put you on block or mute or if this is temporary and you’ll get back to being a better contributor here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

They were saying robotic bc of how he drops back and works into his throw. His timing is off because of it. It isnt "how he looks" its the robotic process of getting through his drop back and step into the throw. 

 

That is a HUGE deal in the NFL because timing is everything.

His timing isn't off though. The ball is showing up right when it's supposed to. That's the only timing that actually matters. He's delivered the football with better timing and location than anyone else in this group.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

That's a weird post considering it's a thread literally existing to discuss these very Combine drills.

 

 

It's not odd. That fact you are placing judgment on how good they are or will be on a few drills is what's odd. And that fact that I mentioned it upset you two is what's odd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

I enjoy the combine and it's good to discuss and go back and forth but in general throwing in shorts doesn't mean much. I would still roll the dice on Richardson at this point in time though if it came down to it.

Depends on if we sit still or move up. If we are making a big move I’d love to shoot for Stroud. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we went LB at 19, the LB at 51 better be head and shoulders the BPA on our board. I was thinking more like 1st or 2nd and then double dipping in the mid-rounda But yeah, if we went LB back to back jn the 1st and 2nd and they turned out like Star and Short I don't think anyone would be complaining. Well, not many anyway. There's always gonna be a few no matter what. LOL 
    • I have been doing a bunch of mock drafts and this one interesting scenario popped up that made me question myself. I know our needs edge, mike, OT,wr, and secondary. This situation Love fell to 19 and I know we don't NEED a RB. But if we stay out at 19(I don't think we do) I don't think I could say no to love. If this team really believes in BPA and love is there at 19 who realistic is better than love at this point? Love is a top 5 talent, there is no akeem messador or Caleb banks or Kenyon Sadiq type player I think I would rather have than love. He would make Bryce life much easier, he's a homerun threat on a offense that lacks speed. He's essentially modern day Reggie bush to me and I think he could play alongside Chubba on passing down potentially as a slot and be the speed threat we really need. I think it's a bit crazy but I would be willing to wait til the second round and see who falls at edge(I think we land Chubb or loyd in free agency) maybe chase TJ parker if he falls or Rodriguez or golliday in the second/third. What say you?
    • They have also beaten the Rockets, Lakers, Spurs, and Nuggets... 
×
×
  • Create New...