Combine Drills: Quarterback Day

[TheCasillas]

Worried about where AR's shoulders are when finishing his throws. His shoulders are over his toes... which leads to him putting all of his weight in the front of his throw instead of his base. They are picking this part apart on AR. Seems to be what they are seeing.

Edited March 4, 2023 by TheCasillas

[Bear Hands]

Stroud really looks like the full package.  

[TheCasillas]

Just now, Varking said:

I think CJ brings more than Kirk. 

Potentially. Time will tell for sure.

[Varking]

1 minute ago, Bear Hands said:

Stroud really looks like the full package.  

I been trying to tell people for the longest this kid needs to be the target. 

[TheCasillas]

We need to drft this Dorian Thompson-Robinson.. he is the perfect PJ Walker backfill

[Bear Hands]

Just now, Varking said:

I been trying to tell people for the longest this kid needs to be the target. 

His accuracy is next level above this QB class.  No age concerns.  Has the arm.  The size. 

His throws are just on point, just like in his games.  Knows exactly where he's placing them.  He's simply made to play QB.    

[TheCasillas]

AR and CJ are struggling right now ... there anticpation is off. It is a very difficult NFL throw... but Tune def came out on top in that drill. 

[RJK]

Stroud evens the playing field in the throwing portion. I’d be fine with stroud, Richardson, young in no particular order. Levis is meh 

Edited March 4, 2023 by RJK

[Varking]

What doesn’t Stroud do that we want? Call Chicago and go get him. 

[Sub Zero]

 

[LinvilleGorge]

10 minutes ago, Varking said:

I think CJ brings more than Kirk. 

I've heard more than a couple players hint that the feeling on Cousins around the league is that he's a guy who cares more about taking care of his stat line than winning games.

[rebelrouser]

1. Stroud 2. Young 3. AR 4. Levis. DTR looking good too.

[Varking]

1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

 

Chefs kiss

[Proudiddy]

37 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My only question is what exactly does that mean? Do we identify a specific guy? Because that means going to #1  Do we identify say three guys that we'd be thrilled to have and that means moving up to at least #3? Are we just trying to decide if we're still in the market to try to trade for #1?

I don't know.

I took it, combined with what Fitt said, that were are planning to identify THE guy, not just one we'd be happy with if they fell to us, and so long as the interviews and workouts affirmed their belief, we would move up to where we needed to in order to get that guy.  Again, taking into account Fitt's "this is the year to do it," "if we identify the guy we want and trade up, we won't be picking that high again anyway," and "if you find a guy you like, you go up and get him" comments, it all jibes with what Leaky said here.

He also didn't exclude the idea that we still bring in a high-end vet.  The sense I got was that he was saying the vet move will kind of play off what we decide to do with the draft, first and foremost.