Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Ravens can’t be this dumb? They’re a smart organization right?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It means he's not the boogeyman you're making him out to be.

No, it means that the Ravens are dumbasses. Furthermore, I don't think that he's the boogeyman, but I know that he has been a league MVP and has that type of talent.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, top dawg said:

No, it means that the Ravens are dumbasses. Furthermore, I don't think that he's the boogeyman, but I know that he has been a league MVP and has that type of talent.

Do you know what the NFL stands for , Not For Long , Cam has been a league MVP also , but he isn't ever going to be able to play at that level again

What someone has been means nothing, it only matters what you can bring now, and The Ravens are not blind, if Lamar was capable of getting them back to the superbowl , They would break the bank to keep him

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, top dawg said:

No, it means that the Ravens are dumbasses. Furthermore, I don't think that he's the boogeyman, but I know that he has been a league MVP and has that type of talent.

Yet still lost to us last year.

And heck, we've beaten MVPs before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

Do you know what the NFL stands for , Not For Long , Cam has been a league MVP also , but he isn't ever going to be able to play at that level again

What someone has been means nothing, it only matters what you can bring now, and The Ravens are not blind, if Lamar was capable of getting them back to the superbowl , They would break the bank to keep him

 

 

 

No, they don't want to break the bank to keep him. What they want is to keep contracts for star QBs (if not star players at any position) what they consider reasonable. What they definitely don't want is to set in stone a precedent of guaranteeing NFL contracts. 

What you fail to realize is if they thought that Lamar was incapable of getting them back to the Super Bowl, then they wouldn't have offered him a contract at all. If you don't believe that, then watch what happens. There is a whole lot of politicking going on here, and seeing who will blink first. If the Ravens fail to get it done, someone else will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yet still lost to us last year.

And heck, we've beaten MVPs before.

Yes, any given Sunday...Furthermore, It's funny how you want to basically blame Lamar Jackson for the loss, but conveniently forget that he's a part of an organization that you've been putting on a pedestal as a role model of a franchise. Lamar didn't lose to us by himself, there's a pretty good coach, and DC (among others) that got their asses whipped also. John Harbaugh lost to Steve Wilks and a broken coaching staff, but that has conveniently been left out of your decidedly weak attempt to blame all things bad on Jackson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Or it's going to be 50m a year for a QB that hasn't finished the year the past 2 seasons. Risky either way. 

Yes, risks abound, but someone is going to weigh the risks and go from there. Some team will likely trade up to one, and some team is likely going to pay Jackson. "No risk it, no biscuit!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

And lost to Steve Wilks with half a coaching staff 

Huh? Ravens won 13-3 on Nov 20, 2022. 

Topdawg you should know by now to fact check everything this guy says before wasting energy debating him 

Edited by csx
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

He's using the Watson contract as leverage. No team is offering him that deal.

 

What he will get is 200 mil guaranteed.

 

 

Like it or not Watson is a much better qb. Well he was before the rub and tug scandal and not playing for a couple of years thing. He still wasn't worth that much guaranteed money before all that. Lamar better take that offer and tell his momma to take a pill. What he really needs to do is get an agent.  I would not touch him just on that fact alone. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...