Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Kunkel says we're only "seriously interested" in three


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

This. We're going to hear every rumor under the sun and be expected to draft every draft eligible QB between now and then. Buckle up and don't get too excited or disappointed along the way.

Now where's the fun in that? It's entertaining to watch the meltdowns over rumors. I cannot wait until draft night when bubbles are burst and the ranting goes into overdrive. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why anyone gives Will Kunkel any level of credence. Let the rumors fly. Regardless it's much better knowing for sure one way or the other we are going to make some kind of big move. I'll hope for the best whichever QB we end up drafting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Now where's the fun in that? It's entertaining to watch the meltdowns over rumors. I cannot wait until draft night when bubbles are burst and the ranting goes into overdrive. 

Doesn't matter what we do, there will be a sizeable faction of the Huddle who thinks we've paved the way to a dynasty and a roughly equally sizeable faction who thinks we've doomed ourselves to a decade of bottom feeding. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I hope he's right. I hope there are three QBs we'd love to have. That means we can go to #3 instead of #1. It still won't be cheap but hopefully considerably cheaper than #1.

If they want someone that can start day 1, that only leaves 1, maybe 2 QBs(Young and maybe Stroud). Levis is not ready to start.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Now where's the fun in that? It's entertaining to watch the meltdowns over rumors. I cannot wait until draft night when bubbles are burst and the ranting goes into overdrive. 

So true.

Honestly, I don't know who they should draft, but I know they had better be right, especially if they move up. And I'm not even necessarily saying they have to get the best guy, but the pick had better be able to lead a football team...on the field.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

So true.

Honestly, I don't know who they should draft, but I know they had better be right, especially if they move up. And I'm not even necessarily saying they have to get the best guy, but the pick had better be able to lead a football team...on the field.

This the best you can hope for. If he turns out to be better than that then let's win this thing. If he's turns out to be worse then back to the draft we go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I hope he's right. I hope there are three QBs we'd love to have. That means we can go to #3 instead of #1. It still won't be cheap but hopefully considerably cheaper than #1.

He's not the only one saying that.

It pretty closely matches what Joe Person has said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...