Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Kunkel says we're only "seriously interested" in three


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Yep I think once the smoke clears we’re stuck with Levis

I know they’re desperately trying to get to 1 but I’m not sure it happens 

I honestly don't have a problem with it.  I PREFER AR because he is younger with more upside IMO, but I don't have a fraction of the knowledge our staff does about developing QBs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

I just don't think what's between his ears can be fixed. It's similar to Sam Darnold. He'll need an almost perfect team around him to make it in this league from what I've watched. I could be wrong, but it's just my opinion from what I've seen.

That’s who I keep coming back to when I watch Levis. Sam f’n Darnold. All the tools in the world but can’t process sh!t. That’s a hard thing to be able to just start doing while playing in the NFL. He rarely shows the ability to throw with anticipation on top of that. Pocket awareness is sh!t too. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

Okay, what did you mean? People here are giving Kunkel poo for being a nobody that seems to make less than accurate predictions. How is Gil Bradnt, someone's who career in the NFL that spanned decades, analogous to him?

Read the post again.

The point was that people often judge reporters unrealistically, with one of those standards being whether or not it's something they want to hear.

Another example...

Reporter X writes that the Panthers are interested in Free Agent Y...

 Free Agent Y signs somewhere else...

The Huddle concludes that Reporter X doesn't know what he's talking about...

cdc.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Read the post again.

The point was that people often judge reporters unrealistically, with one of those standards being whether or not it's something they want to hear.

Another example...

Reporter X writes that the Panthers are interested in Free Agent Y...

 Free Agent Y signs somewhere else...

The Huddle concludes that Reporter X doesn't know what he's talking about...

cdc.jpg

7dra5g.jpg

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

According to Anthony Rizzuti, Will Kunkel of Queen City News says that he believes that we are only "seriously interested" in three of the four top QB prospects in this year's draft (spoiler: and AR15 ain't one of them).

 

"Will Kunkel of FOX Charlotte was featured on Wednesday’s episode of the Panthers On Tap podcast, joining hosts Curtis Rauen and Bryson Karbley to put a bow on the combine. When going over their options under center in this year’s draft, Kunkel said he believes that there are only three prospects in play for Carolina’s first-round pick—Bryce Young, CJ Stroud and Will Levis."

Here is what Kunkel said:

I think those are the only three that they are seriously interested in,” he said. “I do not think Anthony Richardson is a good play for them, and I don’t think they’re overly interested in him because he’s not ready to play in the NFL right away and they don’t have a guy for him to sit behind right now.”

 

A few thoughts:

Charlottonians (damned that's close to charlatans), would Kunkel even really know what we really think, because this "report," as Rizutti characterized it,  screams of speculation?

This belief does kind of fall in line with the thought that we will move up and have built a staff to facilitate the development of a young signal caller. 

The Anthony Richardson post Combine hype is still real. Beteen Rizzuti's unlimited ceiling comment and Kunkel outright saying that AR would be a "good play" for us, is almost as if they are lamenting that he's presumably not in the plans. But, by Kunkel's own admission, "he's not ready to play."

Take it for what it's worth. There is plenty of rationale for our interest to gravitate towards the "top three," and Kunkel's thoughts could easily be real, but it's not like Kunkel said "I know" as opposed to "I think."

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2023/03/08/panthers-2023-draft-seriously-interested-anthony-richardson-bryce-young-cj-stroud-will-levis/

Its total speculation, I mean he even says "I think, I think" quite a bit

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Read the post again.

The point was that people often judge reporters unrealistically, with one of those standards being whether or not it's something they want to hear.

Another example...

Reporter X writes that the Panthers are interested in Free Agent Y...

 Free Agent Y signs somewhere else...

The Huddle concludes that Reporter X doesn't know what he's talking about...

cdc.jpg

I get you take writers, posters and whatever you consider as an insider quite seriously but Kunkel is truly the worst of the worst.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Oh, we aint memeing anymore?

Not when it's one that demonstrates you don't get it.

We just had a discussion about how one of our resident insiders accurately reported our interest in Derek Carr. People goofily tried using the fact that Carr signed somewhere else to discredit them.

That's not how the real world works.

All sports reporters are covering situations that are very fluid. It's the nature of their business.

If you don't understand that, you're not gonna be able to apply a realistic standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

From what I saw of Levis this past season, he needs more time in the oven.

That’s a problem given his age and the systems he’s ran out of college. I will root for him if we draft him obviously but he is the last one I want out of the top 4 projected.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Not when it's one that demonstrates you don't get it.

We just had a discussion about how one of our resident insiders accurately reported our interest in Derek Carr. People goofily tried using the fact that Carr signed somewhere else to discredit them.

That's not how the real world works.

All sports reporters are covering situations that are very fluid. It's the nature of their business.

If you don't understand that, you're not gonna be able to apply a realistic standard.

Okay, so this is about the random no name ALT account that predicted we were seriously interested in Carr, meanwhile everyone else was saying we were 'kicking the tires' or 'doing due diligence'.

Anyway, back to Will Kunkel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

Okay, so this is about the random no name ALT account that predicted we were seriously interested in Carr, meanwhile everyone else was saying we were 'kicking the tires' or 'doing due diligence'.

Anyway, back to Will Kunkel.

Its insanity.   And the fact that scot can not look at things intelligently and see things for what they are is telling.  All the signs were there but leaky said otherwise. 

 

In regards to prospects and how the panthers have them ranked, do you think any of the supposed insiders Newton, Kunkle, Verge, Person etc have a fuging clue what the thought process is 3 days after the combine?  You really think someone is leaking accurate info to anyone?   Goddamn if you believe that

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...