Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So D.J gone..need WR's badly


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

How is a guy who's even weaker an upgrade or even deserving of WR2? 

Hes not? did someone say this was possible?

Id put it at low single digits, but I also wouldnt call him calm bait either. 

Whats wrong with putting Shenault in the same gimmick role? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

We can win this division with Stroud or Young with this defense. We damn near won it with Darnold.

 

I wouldn't say we are a rebuilding roster. If we offer him the most money I can definitely see OBJ coming here. I wouldn't offer him a lot though.

Sam Darnold was the #3 overall pick just only 5 years ago & Baker .Mayfield was the #1 overall pick that very same year.just saying let's hope your right cuz if not buckle up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

Hes not? did someone say this was possible?

Id put it at low single digits, but I also wouldnt call him calm bait either. 

Whats wrong with putting Shenault in the same gimmick role? 

So are we talking ourselves into a gimmick WR being the same gimmick WR, as a way to soften the blow of losing a real WR? What's the end goal, honestly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

So are we talking ourselves into a gimmick WR being the same gimmick WR, as a way to soften the blow of losing a real WR? What's the end goal, honestly?

Im lost at the thought of posters saying he could replace DJ moore. I havnt seen this. 

I see nothing wrong with him in the same role, gimmick or not. 

I do not believe he can step in for DJ moore, link me these statements, please. 

End goal is SB. 

WR-wise is very complicated. TMJ, smith, and Shenault. That may have to be the 2,3, and 4. 

Frank runs a heavy 12 look, may not need 6 WRs. Finding a late stage vet to act as another #2, that seems the realist solution. 

 

 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

D hop is not trying to play with a rookie qb, we are talking about a guy that has dealt with mediocre qb damn near his entire career 

 

Pray we sign some young WRs like mecole, meyers, and slayton and hit on one in the draft, maybe even look to fill the te role in fa and focus on pairing our rookie qb with one of the better WRs coming out, either way scouting department has there work cut out for them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Im lost at the thought of posters saying he could replace DJ moore. I havnt seen this. 

I see nothing wrong with him in the same role, gimmick or not. 

I do not believe he can step in for DJ moore, link me these statements, please. 

End goal is SB. 

WR-wise is very complicated. TMJ, smith, and Shenault. That may have to be the 2,3, and 4. 

Frank runs a heavy 12 look, may not need 6 WRs. Finding a late stage vet to act as another #2, that seems the realist solution. 

 

 

None of those guys are a WR2 and, at best, one is a WR3 but they're probably all WR4s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

None of those guys are a WR2 and, at best, one is a WR3 but they're probably all WR4s.

Quote

Been looking around, its slim pickin'

Both the FA and draft dont have the star level. Like a bunch of mid-2s.

Its not going to be easy. 

I originally wanted to use the 39th on a edge(yea i am a BPA stan), just wanted to add a stud and thats a fair/good spot for this draft. The other spot when this pick happens- WR

 

fyi Shenault was dealt form a fellow that frank should use a similar system, so........ buckle up it maybe a rough go for the next 2 years on the WR front...

 

the pre-tag 2024 WR looks insane, tho.

Its may have to do, best they have. I know its a looonnng limb, players do get better, TMJ did after rhule leftd.

Again may not need a top fight WR, given franks love of 12 personnel. A rookie QBs best friend is a TE. 

Still havnt seen these posts about Moore replaced by Shenault. 

more time passes, moore I miss moore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...