Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What would you ask from Houston?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It just wouldn't make sense to give up your first chance and choice at qb at turning your franchise around just to gain back a few extra picks.  There's no positive way to spin that one.

Of course their is in theory. If you know they want the one you don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, csx said:

Of course their is in theory. If you know they want the one you don't. 

But in that theory, the Texans would then also know they don't want the player we'd prefer, and thus, why would they then give up assets when they could stay put and still get their guy.

That's where the idea of a swap with the Texans falls apart

Back-to-back pick swaps only work for players of a different position and when a 3rd team is involved.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

But in that theory, the Texans would then also know they don't want the player we'd prefer, and thus, why would they then give up assets when they could stay put and still get their guy.

That's where the idea of a swap with the Texans falls apart

Back-to-back pick swaps only work for players of a different position and when a 3rd team is involved.

In theory if we are in the fence between the two and they are fixated it's a logical possibility.

Not really a realistic one I admit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, csx said:

In theory if we are in the fence between the two and they are fixated it's a logical possibility.

Not really a realistic one I admit.

Then fire the entire coaching staff and front office who can't rank one higher than the other.

That's the crux of their jobs, to evaluate who they think is a better player, and that's true for the draft, free agents, and then who to play in games themselves.

If they can't rank one above the other, even by the slightest of margins, with 6 weeks to focus only on those two players, then they don't deserve to be coaches and front office staff in the NFL, period.

In the end, this comes down to it being a QB, any other position and those are all totally valid arguments, but when it comes to QB, you have to take the player you think is the better prospect.  Even if you rank them as 1aaa and 1aab, you have to trust that smallest margin and take your guy when it's about a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stuart Smith said:

If you have done the work to get your guy be very careful. Trading to the number 2 pick to gain a pick could backfire if you don’t control it. 

How?

The team ahead of you, regardless of who they are or even whether they trade to someone else, can only draft a single player.

If you have two players you like equally and you pick second, you're guaranteed one of the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Then fire the entire coaching staff and front office who can't rank one higher than the other.

That's the crux of their jobs, to evaluate who they think is a better player, and that's true for the draft, free agents, and then who to play in games themselves.

If they can't rank one above the other, even by the slightest of margins, with 6 weeks to focus only on those two players, then they don't deserve to be coaches and front office staff in the NFL, period.

In the end, this comes down to it being a QB, any other position and those are all totally valid arguments, but when it comes to QB, you have to take the player you think is the better prospect.  Even if you rank them as 1aaa and 1aab, you have to trust that smallest margin and take your guy when it's about a QB.

Okay, that's just goofy.

Firing a whole staff because they like two or more prospects equally would be absolutely braindead.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Okay, that's just goofy.

Yes it's an extreme take, but do you really want a coaching/front office staff that can't rank two very different players with 6 weeks of dedicated work?

That's really my point, that if they can't, they shouldn't be in this position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tukafan21 said:

Yes it's an extreme take, but do you really want a coaching/front office staff that can't rank two very different players with 6 weeks of dedicated work?

That's really my point, that if they can't, they shouldn't be in this position.

I wouldn't give two sh-ts.

The idea that you can't put equal value on two different players is just silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't give two sh-ts.

The idea that you can't put equal value on two different players is just silly.

There is a difference between putting equal values on two different players and not being able to rank one ahead of the other, even by the slightest of margins, particularly when it comes to the most important single position in all of sports, which QB in the NFL is.

I don't care if you're trying to compare greats like, Brady, Manning, Montana, Mahomes, etc or even Ryan Leaf to Jamarcus Russell.

If you can't rank one QB over another in regards to who you'd draft, then you shouldn't be an NFL HC or GM, period.

You're saying you think there is a scenario where a team would literally have to flip a coin to decide what QB to take at #1 overall and that HC/GM of that team is making the right call by doing so?  

Because that's basically what you're saying here, that the grades are so equal that they can't decide which one should be given the higher grade for one reason or another by the slimmest of margins.  If we had the #1 pick and trading wasn't allowed, and we literally had to flip a coin to make the selection, you'd be okay with that HC and GM keeping their jobs moving forward? 

HELLLLLLL NOOOOOOOO, they NFL HC's and GM's, they have to be able to find a way to rank one over the other by even the slimmest of margins.

That's my point, in the end, they can and will be able to rank one above the other for some reason or another, and that's who I want to take without risking the Texans drafting that player if we were to swap picks.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

There is a difference between putting equal values on two different players and not being able to rank one ahead of the other

Yeah, this makes no sense at all.

It is most definitely possible for a team to place equal value on two players, regardless of position. It happens plenty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In January 2014, I posted this on another forum.  Seems like it fits again:   Do you remember cheering for the rain? Trying to sleep after “The no-call”? Do you know who needs to "Ice up, son"?   Remember pleading for .500? Thinking there’s no catching the Saints? Punting to Buffalo and knowing how it was going to end?   Do you remember how you felt about Kalil’s ad? Or the fan’s follow up? Gruden’s interview with Cam?   Do you remember Clausen being the steal of the draft? Will you ever forgive Mel Kiper?   Did you cry as Jake said his goodbyes? Do you remember the game that cost Gruden his job?   As fans chant “Luuuuuuke,” do you still hear “Moooose”? … “Hoooove”?   Do you recall changing the diaper? Paddling the boat? Being happy just hearing the name Smoot?   Do you recall the day when it hurt to say “Keep pounding,” and you felt you’d lost a close friend?   Did you hunt the net for Bojangle’s commercials? Have you seen a Cajun’s bare butt?   Do you remember the sunken feeling when Smitty was caught from behind and didn’t get up?   Sports Illustrated’s prediction?   Were you angry at Janet for stealing the spotlight? Does “X-Clown” still give you chills? Do you sing the wrong words to “Day-O”? Whenever you hear “He Hate Me,” do you also hear Rosinski finishing the sentence?   Did you like Seifert a little less when he let Walls’ streak of games-with-a-reception end? But nothing compared to letting Steve go, right? Do you remember that invincible feeling you had when we won the first game of 2001? Do you recall who our division rivals were?   Do you remember thinking “Just wait ‘til Bazooka’s healthy”? How about that weird grin you got watching Kevin Greene fire up the D? Or being undefeated at Ericsson?   If your answer is “no,” we happily welcome you as a new fan of our beloved team. Trust me, we’ll be happy to explain all of these and more to catch you up. For the rest of you, it’s been entirely too long since we were alive after week 17. But every question that you answered “yes” to makes this all the sweeter. Welcome to the playoffs.
    • Future considerations......     DUE to several high dollar players spending time on IR the canes have    37M in trade deadline cap space.....    
    • My 20 year old hoodie is still holding together.    PS if you want to get technical, any cable or streaming sub, even watching the network broadcasts, is supporting him. 
×
×
  • Create New...