Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Video Breaking down how Bryce Young can actually throw to the middle of the field


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

CJ is taller and more solid.

CJ has the better arm.

Both are incredibly accurate.

Young has better pocket presence and awareness.

Young Has better improvisational skills.

Young is much better under pressure.

I think it comes down to do Young's innate abilities to sense and avoid pressure mean he will be able to avoid the big hits we are worried he would take?

Like I've said before, I go back and forth on these two daily. I wish Young were two inches taller, then this wouldn't even be a discussion. That's why I lean towards young in general.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

CJ is taller and more solid.

CJ has the better arm.

Both are incredibly accurate.

Young has better pocket presence and awareness.

Young Has better improvisational skills.

Young is much better under pressure.

I think it comes down to do Young's innate abilities to sense and avoid pressure mean he will be able to avoid the big hits we are worried he would take?

Like I've said before, I go back and forth on these two daily. I wish Young were two inches taller, then this wouldn't even be a discussion. That's why I lean towards young in general.

CJ is taller and more solid

CJ has better arm

CJ has better mechanics

CJ has pin point accuracy

Both have good pocket awareness

Both are good under pressure 

Young has better improvisational skills

 

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

CJ is taller and more solid.

CJ has the better arm.

Both are incredibly accurate.

Young has better pocket presence and awareness.

Young Has better improvisational skills.

Young is much better under pressure.

I think it comes down to do Young's innate abilities to sense and avoid pressure mean he will be able to avoid the big hits we are worried he would take?

Like I've said before, I go back and forth on these two daily. I wish Young were two inches taller, then this wouldn't even be a discussion. That's why I lean towards young in general.

I think if Young was even 6’ 200 (playing weight) I’d lean towards him and that’s still a smaller QB. Young thrives under pressure, but I think Stroud is better in the pocket. Stroud thrives in rhythm and timing. He gets the ball out quickly which I think might translate better in the NFL. I’m just concerned that Young’s style of play leads to more hits which paired with his shall frame makes him slightly more of a risk IMO.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

CJ is taller and more solid

CJ has better arm

CJ has better mechanics

CJ has pin point accuracy

Both have good pocket awareness

Both are good under pressure 

Young has better improvisational skills

 

 

 

 

 

Young has better pocket awareness. He feels pressure much better than Stroud. Because of that, he is Much better under pressure than Stroud, Stroud is not good under pressure:

Quote

What he needs to improve: We just talked about how good Stroud is when kept clean in the pocket (71.7% completion rate, 35 touchdowns, 93.4 PFF grade). Well, he is basically the polar opposite under pressure (41.3% completion rate, six touchdowns, 42.0 PFF grade).

https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2023-nfl-draft-profile-c-j-stroud-ohio-state

Stroud had one game where he played well under pressure, and even then he left some meat on the bone against Georgia.

I say this liking Stroud as a prospect because there is a ton to like - the mechanics you mentioned and his pinpoint accuracy are both amazing. He looks effortless throwing the ball. BUT I think Young is the better QB prospect with size taken out of the equation.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Young has better pocket awareness. He feels pressure much better than Stroud. Because of that, he is Much better under pressure than Stroud, Stroud is not good under pressure:

https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2023-nfl-draft-profile-c-j-stroud-ohio-state

Stroud had one game where he played well under pressure, and even then he left some meat on the bone against Georgia.

I say this liking Stroud as a prospect because there is a ton to like - the mechanics you mentioned and his pinpoint accuracy are both amazing. He looks effortless throwing the ball. BUT I think Young is the better QB prospect with size taken out of the equation.

So what is it about the size that concerns you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Losovoevosseniorcapspeciai said:

So what is it about the size that concerns you?

How Frail is he? Will he bend in half if Myles Garret Sacks him? I don't care about his height at all, it's his thiccness, or the lack-thereof that concerns me and most others. He won't ALWAYS be able to diagnose pressure and sometimes guys get beat. Will he be able to handle taking the big hits he took in college but at the pro level?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

How Frail is he? Will he bend in half if Myles Garret Sacks him? I don't care about his height at all, it's his thiccness, or the lack-thereof that concerns me and most others. He won't ALWAYS be able to diagnose pressure and sometimes guys get beat. Will he be able to handle taking the big hits he took in college but at the pro level?

Yeah it’s a durability thing. People keep referencing Brees. Young is even a good bit smaller than him. The difference between Rodgers and Brees is the same as Brees and Young (about 2 inches and 15-20 pounds). Brees also got the ball out quick (played more like Stroud honestly) and took very little hits. It’s enough of a concern for me to rate Stroud about Young comfortably. Young is still a great prospect, but so is Stroud with less of a risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah it’s a durability thing. People keep referencing Brees. Young is even a good bit smaller than him. The difference between Rodgers and Brees is the same as Brees and Young (about 2 inches and 15-20 pounds). Brees also got the ball out quick (played more like Stroud honestly) and took very little hits. It’s enough of a concern for me to rate Stroud about Young comfortably. Young is still a great prospect, but so is Stroud with less of a risk.

As far as what’s in this man’s soul, the posted video gives some great insight into his personal toughness. 
 

As far as the data..

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2018/weight-and-injuries
 

…it’s a nonstarter.

 

statistics:  not just for losers anymore! 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Losovoevosseniorcapspeciai said:

As far as the data..

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2018/weight-and-injuries
 

…it’s a nonstarter.

 

statistics:  not just for losers anymore! 

You can post that link a hundred more times it won't make a difference in what will happen if a 300 pound defensive lineman lands on Bryce Young.

Just a heads up. You extreme Young guys are making it so even the regular folks in favor of him are looking at you like you're wacked out of your mind. Take a breather for a bit.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Getting a QB that is the mirror image of Brees gives us a plus and that alone could possibly get our first road to the SB win. I know it is a bit far fetched but nonetheless hopefully it does come true for us.

Bryce Young is not Brees.  He is a smaller, more experienced Anthony Richardson.  That is going to go over like a lead balloon, but that is what I am seeing on film.  Its the hot take version, but I hope it makes people take a deeper look into what they think about the kid.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

You can post that link a hundred more times it won't make a difference in what will happen if a 300 pound defensive lineman lands on Bryce Young.

Just a heads up. You extreme Young guys are making it so even the regular folks in favor of him are looking at you like you're wacked out of your mind. Take a breather for a bit.

That’s specifically what the link is about. Meant to ease that specific concern. It’s just a helpful point for analysis. Perhaps some haven’t seen. No need to be hateful. We’re on the same team here. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...