Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do the Panthers take advantage of a strong TE class or ignore drafting a TE since they signed Hurst?


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

What was supposedly a strength going into last season looked horrible once Donte and Jaycee went down. And Donte is also a liability against certain guys. I could see Ringo dropping as well but not sure if he'd be a great fit

Yea, I was wrong about it being the strongest group. I thought Taylor and Henderson were dawgs, more like frogs....... Its a need&want and I like others are mistakenly overlooking it. 

I do believe the Cam Smith stuff as well. Ive heard horn has been helping him too ...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Yea, I was wrong about it being the strongest group. I thought Taylor and Henderson were dawgs, more like frogs....... Its a need&want and I like others are mistakenly overlooking it. 

I do believe the Cam Smith stuff as well. Ive heard horn has been helping him too ...

Granted as much as I like Wilks, I've never liked that zone scheme and it really didn't fit with our roster of guys that needed to be more physical to succeed. And the fact he's bringing Hartsfield to SF with him just adds to the argument we made the right coaching decisions. Taylor looked a lot better his rookie year honestly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Granted as much as I like Wilks, I've never liked that zone scheme and it really didn't fit with our roster of guys that needed to be more physical to succeed. And the fact he's bringing Hartsfield to SF with him just adds to the argument we made the right coaching decisions. Taylor looked a lot better his rookie year honestly. 

Wilks staff would have been no comparison. I bet wilks also told tepper, fitt, and others frank would be his OC........... when asked who if not frank "uhhhhhh, what about year two with mccadoo?!?! no?...ill look into it...." frank had 4-5-6 people legit coaches on speed dial and confirms form most. 

Taylor did look lots better as a rookie, thats why I didnt sweat it along with 9th overall pick handerson. Taylor, if not for luck and being drafted by this group, should have been cut around week 12...forget that evans showcase.....Who knows if either can get over the being burnt on the reg. Henderson average one compete bone-headed play each week, but would either get a INT or 3rd PD....taylor was just bad..... 

They do get STO back form injury, yea hes a STer, but got good speed(before) and this is a new group of eyes and minds. Hes a hands dirty worker, maybe he could surprise....panthers need some luck...   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OceanRider said:

After listening to the press conference, I don’t see the the brass doing anything other than going BPA. They are trying to shore up the holes in FA as best they can. Almost sounds like they might lean toward DBs if they “reach” at all. 

I suspect that if they do go defense in the 2nd it would be for an edge rusher if one has fallen a bit. A LB is in play in the 3rd as well.  I think they truly want to set it up through FA to be able to go bpa at every pick in the draft, including the 1st pick.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I think they truly want to set it up through FA to be able to go bpa at every pick in the draft, including the 1st pick.

I disagree about the 1st pick. You don't give up what they did for anything other than a QB or perhaps a Peppers like DE. And there's no edge/DE like Peppers in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

I disagree about the 1st pick. You don't give up what they did for anything other than a QB or perhaps a Peppers like DE. And there's no edge/DE like Peppers in this draft.

There are no defensive players that high on their board dude. They have 4 qb's.  Where have you been?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

There are no defensive players that high on their board dude. They have 4 qb's.  Where have you been?

Robinson, the RB and Anderson, the DE, along with Young have been touted as the best players in the draft since last season by the majority of the talking heads and experts. Even after the combine, the top four QBs haven't been seen as the four best players in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Robinson, the RB and Anderson, the DE, along with Young have been touted as the best players in the draft since last season by the majority of the talking heads and experts. Even after the combine, the top four QBs haven't been seen as the four best players in the draft.

You cannot go by anyone's rankings outside of theirs. They decide how they rank the different groups according to their needs.  Their number 1 need is a rookie qb.  It doesn't matter if a defensive player is ranked by some amateur draft "experts" as number 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

They decide how they rank the different groups according to their needs.

So now it's needs based instead of true BPA? If so, you're not going BPA. Going BPA is taking the best player regardless of what position he plays. That's why it's called Best Player Available instead of Best Player That Fits Needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

So now it's needs based instead of true BPA? If so, you're not going BPA. Going BPA is taking the best player regardless of what position he plays. That's why it's called Best Player Available instead of Best Player That Fits Needs.

With the 1st overall pick it's absolutely a qb for us. If you trade for the 1st overall pick it is absolutely for need. That is not debatable for our team. So yes, the 1st pick is a huge need for us. After that FA sets up to go bpa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

With the 1st overall pick it's absolutely a qb for us. If you trade for the 1st overall pick it is absolutely for need. That is not debatable for our team. So yes, the 1st pick is a huge need for us. After that FA sets up to go bpa.

Honestly, most teams draft for need. The only time I can recall seeing a team maybe going BPA in round 1 in the NFL draft was when the Packers took Rodgers. The only time I can truly point to BPA being done was the 76ers in the NBA draft the three years they took a center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you think the NFL or NBA are worried about lawsuits or something like officiating scandals bringing down their empires, I think you're giving them way too much credit.  Go watch the documentary on Tim Donaghy in the NBA and who was involved and what he did.  One of the guys he worked with is still one of the league's top trusted officials, especially for playoff games.  IIRC, they have records showing he was the person Donaghy exchanged phone calls with the most during his time fixing games.  And his reputation is beyond horrible...  but he's untouchable.  I also encourage you to go watch DeMaurice Smith's Breakfast Club interview.  He laid out how for fans, we just know these organizations as a singular, public entity - like THE Carolina Panthers, or THE Dallas Cowboys- but, in actuality, he said that is the public-facing identity of an umbrella company comprised of countless smaller businesses and LLCs.  He is tasked with trying to audit their books, and he said these organizations are structured in such a way that even HE can't ever know what they truly make in a year.  It's impossible.  And now, this is just me speculating on top of that, but you think the league's themselves are structured similarly?  They are untouchable.  IIRC, they are recognized legally as "entertainment" organizations, thus protecting themselves in cases where integrity would come into question.  They are protected, layer, behind layer, behind layer.  Betting works because there is some degree of control that ensures the house wins more than it loses, by a lot.  The short of it is, "Give them bread and circuses" and all that jazz.  These leagues operate with total impunity.  Again, it's not just because I'm a Panthers fan, but even if I wasn't and I watched Superbowl 50 without a dog in the fight I would walk away feeling like that outcome was controlled and influenced HEAVILY to where the Panthers were not given a level playing field.  The same poo happens every Sunday to teams playing those blue blood franchises and ones with intriguing storylines. 
    • This Chuba isn't getting traded, but Rico very well could be in a few weeks if he keeps playing well in a tandem backfield with Chuba also playing well. I think we'd end up going with a two headed monster in that case, but with Rico being on a one year deal, it does open up the possibility of a contending team offering up a decent pick for him.  Depending on the recovery of Hampton, I could see someone like the Chargers giving us a 4th for him if they think he could put them over the top, he would fit nicely in a Harbaugh system I think. If it comes to that, we need to make that trade, as I can't see any way we re-sign Rico with all our other needs and getting Brooks back too.  And he's not going to get a contract big enough to get us any comp picks in return, especially if/when we sign a FA or two ourselves.  So if we're not going to bring him back, the prudent decision would really be to get a draft pick for him at the deadline.
    • It's all about what they do at QB. It's clear the rest of the roster is improving. If they commit long term to Young because he's being carried to wins then we're fuged. I think that's a separate issue to finally being competitive again.  There's no QB in this Draft that's going to ride in on his white horse on day one and save us, so we absolutely shouldn't be playing for Draft position. 
×
×
  • Create New...