Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Coach. New QB. New Uniforms?


Whoops
 Share

Recommended Posts

We need a new logo IMO. I get the whole "it's shaped like the Carolinas" thing ... but it's not intimidating, and barely aesthetically pleasing.

My OCD likes the all whites, but I'm fine if they got rid of them. The whole "can't wear black in summer" BS is so dumb. These are men. They can handle it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

We need a new logo IMO. I get the whole "it's shaped like the Carolinas" thing ... but it's not intimidating, and barely aesthetically pleasing.

My OCD likes the all whites, but I'm fine if they got rid of them. The whole "can't wear black in summer" BS is so dumb. These are men. They can handle it.

How many NFL logos are intimidating? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

We need a new logo IMO. I get the whole "it's shaped like the Carolinas" thing ... but it's not intimidating, and barely aesthetically pleasing.

My OCD likes the all whites, but I'm fine if they got rid of them. The whole "can't wear black in summer" BS is so dumb. These are men. They can handle it.

I don’t think any pro football player is going to be intimidated by the logo on the other teams helmet lol. If they are they probably should find a new profession. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, joemac said:

I don’t think any pro football player is going to be intimidated by the logo on the other teams helmet lol. If they are they probably should find a new profession. 

It's more for the fans. Like soccer hooligans. You can't be an intimidating fan base with a dolphin logo for example. And our Panther just looks dorky.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...