Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the S2 TEST take CJ out?


Ivory Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Here is a newer article at the S2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2023/03/21/nfl-s2-cognition-quarterbacks/


After a few years of vetting, S2 expanded to a small group of teams, including the Bills, Indianapolis Colts and Kansas City Chiefs. It later began to work with up to two teams per division, including the Panthers and Washington Commanders.

 

Among the 117 quarterbacks S2 had tested up to the 2022 draft, the 13 with career passer ratings above 90 averaged an S2 score (91) that was 40 percentile points higher than those with career passer ratings below 90. Those top-tier quarterbacks tested significantly better in seeing the full field (tracking capacity), picking up on tendencies (instinctive learning), filtering through “if-then” rules during plays (decision complexity) and focusing amid stimuli (distraction control).

 

Thx for sharing. Really good insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wolfcop said:

from Person this morning, regarding Richardson:
 

The Florida quarterback with the Cam Newton-like physiqueremains under consideration by the Panthers, according to a source with knowledge of the situation. 


You Young lovers better not get too comfortable. Lol

As the rare 

1. Bryce 2. Richardson guy I’m loving it all.

  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea with all tests, including the combine, is to confirm what you already know, it is another data point. If it is different from what you expect you will do some more digging to make sure you didn’t miss anything. A high score on this test doesn’t mean you will be a successful QB, however a low score is a bit concerning and you will have to do some additional homework, no doubt.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, matt rhules gut fat said:

Hard to coach and now a poor S2 test.

Sounds like someone is doing all they can to get CJ to fall to them.

I sense it’s teams who are trying to trade  up to 3 to grab him now that they’re beating he won’t go 1 or 2.

Starting some of the hard to Coach type rumors to possibly give other teams they’re fight for that pick 2nd thoughts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, stan786 said:

As the rare 

1. Bryce 2. Richardson guy I’m loving it all.

I'm in this camp as well. I see Bryce as the best QB in this class on Day 1 with a top 5 QB ceiling. However, Anthony Richardson has top 3 QB ceiling if he puts it all together. 

I'm fine with Stroud. However, I see him being a top 8-15 QB. Which is pro bowl level but not all-pro or MVP range I see the other two. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ivory Panther said:

Rumor is CJ scored low on the test…now rumors are even the Texans r passing on him at 2. 

 

I doubt whether he actually scored low and whether teams will get too caught up in the test. It is merely a component of the player.  Tape being the most important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...