Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Islanders Game 1 Monday

Panthers Fan 69

By Panthers Fan 69,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

Rocky Davis Veteran

Rocky Davis

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

Yeah, I started out watching ESPN but it was obvious how little they cared about our game, I switched it to the local broadcast, chip and the gang are so refreshing compared to the zombies on ESPN 

WTF is Chip and Gang? 

😂🤣😂🤣😂

Post of the night, get Chip and the Gang for the next broadcast too.....

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Mayfield laying on top of Stepan long after the whistle.

This was a common tactic last night. I assume to stop us cycling. But it was definitely ridiculous, at some point you gotta call it something. It happened at least a dozen times. Luckily we didn’t let it get to us. 
 

Also wtf was up with the islanders sticks, those things were breaking left and right.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted

So here’s my recap.

What I liked: Our level of physicality, finishing hits. PP1 Unit. Raanta, especially his tracking of long pucks.

What I didn’t like: Not finding the net 5v5 especially with a poo ton of high dangers. Our defense collapsing in the first period around Raanta. We usually don’t play house. 
 

We need to make these high dangers goals vs. good goalies, if we can do that the sky’s the limit. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DavidEng Grand Master

DavidEng

Posted
Posted

Mike Fink article on thehockeywriters site about the game is biased BS.

”The Islanders outplayed the Hurricanes for the majority of the game and outscored them in even-strength play.”

I left a comment:

“You say the Islanders outplayed the Hurricanes? Laughable, the stats prove otherwise. Canes SOG 37 to Islanders 26. Canes won the faceoffs. Canes 2/4 on the PP to Isles 0/4.

Less bias and more facts in your next article please.”

Please feel free to comment if you want, sign up not required-

https://thehockeywriters.com/islanders-loss-hurricanes-04-17-2023/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, DavidEng said:

Mike Fink article on thehockeywriters site about the game is biased BS.

”The Islanders outplayed the Hurricanes for the majority of the game and outscored them in even-strength play.”

I left a comment:

“You say the Islanders outplayed the Hurricanes? Laughable, the stats prove otherwise. Canes SOG 37 to Islanders 26. Canes won the faceoffs. Canes 2/4 on the PP to Isles 0/4.

Less bias and more facts in your next article please.”

Please feel free to comment if you want, sign up not required-

https://thehockeywriters.com/islanders-loss-hurricanes-04-17-2023/

Who? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DavidEng Grand Master

DavidEng

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

You had a enough time to sign up for some random account and comment on it but won’t send one of our own a link?

I included a link to the article. I didn’t have to sign up as I stated in my post.

He is a writer for the site I linked to and covers the Islanders hockey. Hope that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ECHornet
      Known Prospect Meetings with Panthers

      By ECHornet · Posted

      Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • LinvilleGorge
      Tight End: The Need is Bigger than We Think

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • strato
      Known Prospect Meetings with Panthers

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...