Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scenario for our second pick


JawnyBlaze
 Share

Recommended Posts

Would you guys be ok with this scenario?

Variables:

JSN falls to the mid 20s, just say 25 for example. Entirely possible, he’s not elite and a team could definitely still have QR at #1 based on athleticism and YAC abilities. 
 

Carolina takes Young #1, for the purpose of this hypothetical just to avoid the existing relationship bias.

Trade:

Carolina trades #39, #93 and next year’s third to move to 25 to take JSN.  Value works out, I know most want to trade down rather than up given our remaining draft positions, but there’s something to be said for quality over quantity and we don’t have many holes.  Better to get higher quality pieces and build toward longer term success than trying to get to mid tier asap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say hard pass giving up a 3rd and having no pick from #25 until #114 with even less capital this year AND next.  Next draft would be bare bones 2, 4, 5, & 6.  

I'd rather target a minor trade up for Johnston or Flowers if they are there early 30s.  But honestly, I'm not so sure I want any of them THAT badly over what Tillman, Mingo, Scott, Hutchinson, Wilson, Reed etc. could give us without giving anything up.  

Edited by Bear Hands
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, if we do take Bryce Young, I can see us taking a page from the Jaguars book and picking up the very talented running back that was in the backfield with Young, much like the safety blanket pick of Travis Etienne was for Trevor Lawrence -- one that paid dividends once coaching was improved. 

Jahmyr Gibbs out of Alabama is a fantastic running back and was a reliable protector, receiver and rusher alongside Bryce. Considering the way the draft seems to be falling out and the lack of interest in running backs, Gibbs could certainly be sitting there at 39 and I think would be a good return on the investment.

Anything that makes the transition easier for Young will help everyone out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

My opinion? Forget going after WR in this draft--JSN might be a second rounder in other years.  I think we are not going to do much more at WR.

The draft is deep at Edge, CB, and TE.  We have needs at those positions.  I think we might grab an Edge and CB---maybe or maybe not a TE--and we will grab an OL.

This ^^ I might grab a Wr later in the draft with KR and PR abilities but this draft isn’t a trade up for WR draft and we did a lot at that position in the offseason..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Khyber53 said:

Honestly, if we do take Bryce Young, I can see us taking a page from the Jaguars book and picking up the very talented running back that was in the backfield with Young, much like the safety blanket pick of Travis Etienne was for Trevor Lawrence -- one that paid dividends once coaching was improved. 

Jahmyr Gibbs out of Alabama is a fantastic running back and was a reliable protector, receiver and rusher alongside Bryce. Considering the way the draft seems to be falling out and the lack of interest in running backs, Gibbs could certainly be sitting there at 39 and I think would be a good return on the investment.

Anything that makes the transition easier for Young will help everyone out.

If Gibbs is there at 39, you run to that damn podium.  

I think we have more of an impact slot to fill at RB over TE & WR when you consider who may actually get productive regular season snaps.  Brown comes from committee environments and Reich had that in Philly.  Just got lucky with Taylor but they're all committee type approaches.    

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Khyber53 said:

Honestly, if we do take Bryce Young, I can see us taking a page from the Jaguars book and picking up the very talented running back that was in the backfield with Young, much like the safety blanket pick of Travis Etienne was for Trevor Lawrence -- one that paid dividends once coaching was improved. 

Jahmyr Gibbs out of Alabama is a fantastic running back and was a reliable protector, receiver and rusher alongside Bryce. Considering the way the draft seems to be falling out and the lack of interest in running backs, Gibbs could certainly be sitting there at 39 and I think would be a good return on the investment.

Anything that makes the transition easier for Young will help everyone out.

I might have agreed if Miles Sanders didn’t get the deal he did.. RB is a later round need.. If we get a familiar target for Young it probably be Latu..

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

If Gibbs is there at 39, you run to that damn podium.  

I think we have more of an impact slot to fill at RB over TE & WR when you consider who may actually get productive regular season snaps.  Brown comes from committee environments and Reich had that in Philly.  Just got lucky with Taylor but they're all committee type approaches.    

I can’t agree.. If we had signed Forman back then yes.. But signing Miles to that deal made it clear they aren’t taking a RB that high..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

If Gibbs is there at 39, you run to that damn podium.  

I think we have more of an impact slot to fill at RB over TE & WR when you consider who may actually get productive regular season snaps.  Brown comes from committee environments and Reich had that in Philly.  Just got lucky with Taylor but they're all committee type approaches.    

Funny thing is he will probably be there at 39 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I can’t agree.. If we had signed Forman back then yes.. But signing Miles to that deal made it clear they aren’t taking a RB that high..

If they are in fact taking a committee approach as they stressed in pressers, I'm just unsure if you want to hand Hubbard ~15-20%-ish of offensive snaps when you can get a clear upgrade.  

Hubbard is currently slotted into a spot that will have gameday action.  I'd seek an upgrade if one presents itself via BPA.  

Edited by Bear Hands
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

If they are in fact taking a committee approach as they stressed in pressers, I'm just unsure if you want to hand Hubbard ~15-20%-ish of offensive snaps when you can get a clear upgrade.  

Hubbard is currently slotted into a spot that will have gameday action.  I'd seek an upgrade if one presents itself via BPA.  

You can get a RB to split or compete with Hubbard after the 3rd round.. If you take a RB  in the top 3 rounds he is competing to be the lead back.. And with Miles Contract they aren’t bringing in competition for him.. I just don’t see them spending a high asset pick on a RB when there biggest signing was a RB..

No way you use a 2nd round pick to upgrade a backup..

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...