Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young interview with Ryan Clark


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

russ has to diet to play below 225, little different body type. 

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/russell-wilson/32005749-4c77-7781-795c-94c753706d1d
 

5’11” 204 at the combine. Maybe Russ in his 30s has that issue. Bryce is only 21 which means his body will naturally get thicker as he ages and the NFL dietitians won’t have trouble adding some weight to his frame. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

I have been a Stroud guy during most of this process, but the thing that changed my mind on Young was this: my son is a smaller QB for his age, and I want him to have a role model who wears a Panthers jersey. Bryce seems like a good one to pattern your game after as a QB who is smaller in stature. I would still be excited about CJ, but the father in me wants Bryce. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

The NFL needs him to succeed. Steph changed basketball from a tall person's game to an any person's game--that's huge for marketability and significantly expands your future player pool. 

Bryce can be the same for the NFL, especially in an era of youth football numbers declining, more people worried about life-changing injuries, player retiring in their 20s and early 30s. They will probably institute rule changes over time to support him to--just like the NBA basically did for Steph (even though they'll never admit as much).

Look how articulate you’ve become moving over here to gods country

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

The NFL needs him to succeed. Steph changed basketball from a tall person's game to an any person's game--that's huge for marketability and significantly expands your future player pool. 

Bryce can be the same for the NFL, especially in an era of youth football numbers declining, more people worried about life-changing injuries, player retiring in their 20s and early 30s. They will probably institute rule changes over time to support him to--just like the NBA basically did for Steph (even though they'll never admit as much).

Steph is 6'3"ish, not that out of the ordinary. He doesn't get those comparisons because of height

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

The NFL needs him to succeed. Steph changed basketball from a tall person's game to an any person's game--that's huge for marketability and significantly expands your future player pool. 

Bryce can be the same for the NFL, especially in an era of youth football numbers declining, more people worried about life-changing injuries, player retiring in their 20s and early 30s. They will probably institute rule changes over time to support him to--just like the NBA basically did for Steph (even though they'll never admit as much).

I personally don’t think you have anything to worry about.  Young is going to be great.  I understand this idea that he has always played for great teams, back even back to high school.  People ding him for that which to me makes no sense.  He elevated his teams.  Bryce is special 

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Don't get too cocky. You haven't been far from it.

I hope all the mods will be more lenient come draft time.  This is one of the more emotional drafts for us in memory.  Thanks for what you do but folks will get a little nuts 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

The NFL needs him to succeed. Steph changed basketball from a tall person's game to an any person's game--that's huge for marketability and significantly expands your future player pool. 

Bryce can be the same for the NFL, especially in an era of youth football numbers declining, more people worried about life-changing injuries, player retiring in their 20s and early 30s. They will probably institute rule changes over time to support him to--just like the NBA basically did for Steph (even though they'll never admit as much).

Steph definitely changed the game of basketball, but not for the reason you listed lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrisbanePanther said:

The NFL needs him to succeed. Steph changed basketball from a tall person's game to an any person's game--that's huge for marketability and significantly expands your future player pool. 

Bryce can be the same for the NFL, especially in an era of youth football numbers declining, more people worried about life-changing injuries, player retiring in their 20s and early 30s. They will probably institute rule changes over time to support him to--just like the NBA basically did for Steph (even though they'll never admit as much).

Why are you comparing Bryce to Steph? Steph is 6'2", Iverson was shorter. Steph is not short for a PG. 

I think Muggsy Bogues is a better comparison. At the most, Spud Webb. 5'6" 133 pounds, now that is undersized for a PG. 

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

I hope all the mods will be more lenient come draft time.  This is one of the more emotional drafts for us in memory.  Thanks for what you do but folks will get a little nuts 

I can't make any promises. Someone gets too drunk/pissed and goes way off the rails then I'll put them in timeout, but I don't plan on being strict.

But if we draft Levis I'm banning everyone and then myself. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

I can't make any promises. Someone gets too drunk/pissed and goes way off the rails then I'll put them in timeout, but I don't plan on being strict.

But if we draft Levis I'm banning everyone and then myself. 

If we draft Levis the site will implode, no need. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I can't make any promises. Someone gets too drunk/pissed and goes way off the rails then I'll put them in timeout, but I don't plan on being strict.

But if we draft Levis I'm banning everyone and then myself. 

LOL, if we draft Levis go ahead and check me out for week please.  It won’t be nice otherwise 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...