Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we grab both Youngs?


jb2288
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Worth noting we don't have a 1st until 25.

Correct which is why I was saying 39 and next years third. I would not give up a first for him even if we had it as I imagine that will be in the 14-18 range for us next year if we did have one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chase Young is a few years away from being a bigger disappointment than Clowney. I had a feeling the kid wouldn't be as good as advertised. 3 generational talents on the DL at OSU in a 3 year span, naw can't see it, someone was bound to not translate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

They're a poverty franchise and do dumb stuff regularly. 

That's always the answer until Snyder officially sells the team. 

Yeah I heard the same reasoning behind the Sam Darnold trade. Forgive me if I'm skeptical. Ron Rivera selected him so he knows what's up. You don't balk on a 1st round option without a good reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Yeah I heard the same reasoning behind the Sam Darnold trade. Forgive me if I'm skeptical. Ron Rivera selected him so he knows what's up. You don't balk on a 1st round option without a good reason. 

Well with Matt Rhule at the helm WE were the poverty franchise that did dumb things, so that reasoning still tracks. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Check out the game by game breakdowns this past year for TMac.  He feasted on bad competition like UNM with 304 yards and 4 TDs then went 7 straight games without a TD. He broke 100 receiving yards in 5 of the 12 games he played.  The only concern I have is him disappearing in some games.  One report is he was playing hurt and I know his QB play was pretty bad.  He just isn't as strong of a prospect as Evans was IMO.  That doesn't mean he won't be great in the NFL.  
    • I swear to god, this has been said so many times by people on here, and I have to call it out for what it is, utter and complete nonsense. This isn't even me pushing for my guy again, it's just dumb.   Bryce doesn't have a cannon for an arm, he literally couldn't even properly take advantage of the type of player you're talking about here if he wanted to.  If you want to say we need an uber quick fast twitch WR to get the ball into their hands and let their speed make plays, that's totally fair.   But to say we need that true speedster deep threat (and I know you didn't include "speedster" but if you're saying "true deep threat" instead of a "jump ball guy" it's clearly what you mean) is just nonsense when our QB has probably the weakest arm of any starting QB (and again, think what you will about Bryce's potential, that's just an indisputable fact). Honestly, I have no idea what people are watching when they say stuff like this Basically every single "expert analysis" of T-Mac as a prospect talks about how he's surprisingly fluid and a threat after the catch for a player of his size.  If you want to talk about his speed and how fast/slow he looks to you, that's something I can't knock as yes, his overall speed is his one main weakness. But to say Evans looked more fluid than T-Mac is again, just literal nonsense, everything else you think about him as a prospect aside.
×
×
  • Create New...