Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So let’s talk about Levis


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah but then they draft Levis so it’s tough to understand where they are coming from…

😂

True. Feels like the exact same thing again. Oh look, here is a very intriguing physical talent available considerably later in the draft than most expected largely based off of mental/processing concerns.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

who’s the thread about

Fairly certain he wouldn't give a sh-t about any of our opinions either (why should he?)

Levis could busy or he could turn out to be great, as could CJ Stroud, Anthony Richardson and yes, Bryce Young.

Acting like we know the outcome for any of them right now is kinda Colin Cowherdish.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂

True. Feels like the exact same thing again. Oh look, here is a very intriguing physical talent available considerably later in the draft than most expected largely based off of mental/processing concerns.

Also known as the drafting formula loads of people on here embraced pre-draft but that everybody is now down on since we went the opposite direction 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Also known as the drafting formula loads of people on here embraced pre-draft but that everybody is now down on since we went the opposite direction 😕

True, but it’s still odd they did a very similar thing a year ago. I think most agree these physically talented, raw QBs need time to develop. They could do this every year, but without time and commitment it’s going to fail. Hopefully they do right by Levis and develop him properly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

True, but it’s still odd they did a very similar thing a year ago. I think most agree these physically talented, raw QBs need time to develop. They could do this every year, but without time and commitment it’s going to fail. Hopefully they do right by Levis and develop him properly. 

It's a bad strategy.

Doing it twice in a row certainly doesn't help.

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Who wanted that approach? 

Anthony Richardson fans.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Fairly certain he wouldn't give a sh-t about any of our opinions either (why should he?)

Levis could busy or he could turn out to be great, as could CJ Stroud, Anthony Richardson and yes, Bryce Young.

Acting like we know the outcome for any of them right now is kinda Colin Cowherdish.

cool. none of that has anything to do with what i said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Richardson was drafted #4 overall and I don't recall any talk of him struggling in interviews, etc. That seems like a huge reach.

The rationale for drafting Richardson was basically the same one for drafting Levis or for Willis last year, i.e. grab the raw guy with the physical talent and coach him up.

One difference: This year's version of that carried the additional tagline of "our coaching staff can handle it". Nobody was saying that last year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Would've been interesting to see if it would've turned out the same way of he hadn't gotten drafted by the best team in the league at the time which was also one of the most stable, well ran organizations in the league. I mean, he got drafted into an absolute dream scenario.

 

True, very true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

The rationale for drafting Richardson was basically the same one for drafting Levis or for Willis last year, i.e. grab the raw guy with the physical talent and coach him up.

One difference: This year's version of that carried the additional tagline of "our coaching staff can handle it". Nobody was saying that last year.

I would have been OK with Richardson at #9. I think he has a better chance of developing than mental case Levis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

The rationale for drafting Richardson was basically the same one for drafting Levis or for Willis last year, i.e. grab the raw guy with the physical talent and coach him up.

One difference: This year's version of that carried the additional tagline of "our coaching staff can handle it". Nobody was saying that last year.

No it didn't.

Richardson had the most jaw dropping tape of any of the QBs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Acting like we know the outcome for any of them right now is kinda Colin Cowherdish.

And your lazy answer is just cowardice.  What’s the point of debate if you say that all four of those have an equal chance of being good. 

I have seen what I have seen from Levis. He has some ego and mental issues which will hinder his development. His tape at Kentucky doesn’t lie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Also known as the drafting formula loads of people on here embraced pre-draft but that everybody is now down on since we went the opposite direction

Wrong again, I never was high on Levis so you should name names or otherwise you’re just being a douche

Edited by NAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can be our post injury Delhomme in 2008. I am fine with Hubbard and Dowdle being our Willliams and Stewart.    Canales has some eating to do and hair to grow if he’s going to be Jeff Davidson tho.
    • This season was about continuing to dig ourselves out of the crater Fitterer (and by extension Young with the three first round picks we traded for him) buried us in. Tepper is determined to make Bryce happen, so we're forced to play him at QB and adjust around his obvious inadequacies. 
    • Has nothing to do with the yards per carry, like at all. It's that 17 of his 25 passes were less than 10 yards downfield, against the worst pass defense in the league.  It's another game where Bryce's passing attempts were mostly dink and dunk type of passes. I wasn't asking us to throw it more yesterday, hell, if anything, you could make an argument that with how we were running it, we should have thrown it less than 25 times anyways.  It's that we still threw it 25 times but only had 8 of them where the ball was thrown 10+ yards downfield. Our schedule takes a dramatic shift after this week, even next week against the Jets, they have a decent defense for a team that hasn't won a game yet.  This was a great opportunity to allow Bryce to throw the ball downfield more against the worst pass defense in the league, hence I'd just have liked to see more than 8 of 25 passes be thrown further than 10 yards downfield. IF we were going to throw it 25 times against Dallas, I'd have liked to see a good 12-15 of them be further than 10 yards downfield, let Bryce work on his weakness against the worst pass defense in the league, not throw more dink and dunk passes per usual.
×
×
  • Create New...