Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Potential $1.2B Panthers stadium renovation discussion


Lame Duck
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Icege said:

From what (little) I understand, there are a few factors:

  • Hotel accommodations 
  • Transportation
  • Fan support

I'd imagine a local government with experience in hosting large scale events is also desirable.

 

I could even see Mint St hosting a lot of the activities

 

Would be nice. Who knows. The draft is a bucket list item for me and being in Charlotte would make the trip a whole lot cheaper!

 

7 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Fan support is not really an issue. Fans travel from all over the country for the SB. I think the problem will be hotel accommodations.

 

I don't think Charlotte has enough upscale hotels for the higher profile people that would come to Charlotte. I could be wrong though not sure how that would work.

 

Maybe by 2026 they will have built a lot more upscale hotels.

Charlotte officially hit the hotel cap needed to host a Super Bowl/draft about two years ago. That’s why they are now able to put their names in the hat for those events.

 

I believe the stadium renovations are the last step. NFL likes hosting the Super Bowl in newer stadiums this decade. Our city administration has a “tourist” budget that has been put toward hosting events like the NBA All Star game, NFL draft and eventually the Super Bowl. 
 

the only remaining factor is the weather….

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, rayzor said:

so if we're close, i wonder if retractable roof is in the works...

since the renovations are in the 1.2 billion range... I would not be surprised... or at least that new 3/4 roof concept that we are seeing across all sports stadium concepts. 

However, I'd love for Tepper to roll out this concept: 

 

This would allow real grass for both soccer and football. Then also allow concerts and events at the stadium without sacrificing the field.  This is getting really popular at the international soccer level, and I believe the Raiders do this with their new field.

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

since the renovations are in the 1.2 billion range... I would not be surprised... or at least that new 3/4 roof concept that we are seeing across all sports stadium concepts. 

However, I'd love for Tepper to roll out this concept: 

 

This would allow real grass for both soccer and football. Then also allow concerts and events at the stadium without sacrificing the field.  This is getting really popular at the international soccer level, and I believe the Raiders do this with their new field.

that would be nice and ideal and would open up for a lot of different kinds of events. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Bills' stadium is $1.2B, Vegas' was $1.9B and the rumored Soldier Field renovation is at $2.2B. 

If we're getting a new stadium, I'm guessing it will approach $3B.

I'd prefer a new stadium, but if we can renovate our stadium to offer a bit more shielding from the elements (sun/rain), have a natural field option and modernize the look, I'm for it. It is hard to swallow the cost when you have one of the richest owners in the league asking for money....especially after two failed projects in Charlotte.

The dynamic of taxpayers assisting in the cost, yet the Owners reap all the profits is baffling. Unless I'm missing something and the city/county/state does get ROI. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

since the renovations are in the 1.2 billion range... I would not be surprised... or at least that new 3/4 roof concept that we are seeing across all sports stadium concepts. 

However, I'd love for Tepper to roll out this concept: 

 

This would allow real grass for both soccer and football. Then also allow concerts and events at the stadium without sacrificing the field.  This is getting really popular at the international soccer level, and I believe the Raiders do this with their new field.

That's amazing, but what is that a 4B dollar cost, that's insane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 5/4/2023 at 5:24 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Economic studies have shown that public spending on stadium projects is a terrible "investments" and essentially amounts to a handout to billionaires. Something feels extremely grifty about the numbers involved too. Jerryworld cost $1.4B to build in '04 and was considered wildly extravagant at the time. The Falcons' new stadium cost $1.6B. You're telling me you need $1.2B just to RENOVATE our current stadium? I call BULLSHIT.

Agreed but I’ll bet half that money goes towards the practice facility. 
 

If they’re going to spend “real money” on a remodel it needs to be a dome. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jbland said:

Agreed but I’ll bet half that money goes towards the practice facility. 
 

If they’re going to spend “real money” on a remodel it needs to be a dome. 

I bet they will put a roof over Panthers stadium for that money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/11/2023 at 6:45 AM, TheCasillas said:

since the renovations are in the 1.2 billion range... I would not be surprised... or at least that new 3/4 roof concept that we are seeing across all sports stadium concepts. 

However, I'd love for Tepper to roll out this concept: 

 

This would allow real grass for both soccer and football. Then also allow concerts and events at the stadium without sacrificing the field.  This is getting really popular at the international soccer level, and I believe the Raiders do this with their new field.

I think Allegiant Stadium is less elaborate, and more like Phoenix.  As I understand it, the grass field is on a try like Phoenix that rolls in and out.  The difference is Allegiant has an artificial turf field on the foundation that the grass field tray sits above when it is rolled in, whereas Phoenix is just the concrete foundation.  I guess the tray for the field in Allegiant has enough support to not sit directly on the artificial turf when it is rolled in.

From what I read, UNLV uses the artificial turf field.  I don't know if that was by choice or the Raidahs don't want the additional wear on their grass field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jbland said:

Agreed but I’ll bet half that money goes towards the practice facility. 
 

If they’re going to spend “real money” on a remodel it needs to be a dome. 

Does the public/local gov't get any ROI when the public funds part of it? Any returns from the gate/concessions/ownership revenue that is collected over the years since the locals are footing part of the bill?

Seems rather "scammy" if the public funds part of it, yet the owners/shareholders reap the profits without reallocating it back to the folks that helped build it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ocpanthertew714 said:

Public funding and billionaires go hand in hang like toothpaste and a toothbrush.

I hope it gets down

Last thing I want is for Charlotte to turn into the new Oakland (in terms of professional sports teams) 

 

I don't. Socializing the costs so the billionaires can reap all the profits is one of the dumbest things this country does repeatedly no matter the industry and it never works for the public like the billionaires claim it will.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...