Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes Vs Devils Game 2 Round 2 8pm


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

100% agree, the NFL and NBA are usually predictable, but the NHL is a true battle of wills, who ever works the hardest usually wins 

I started watching in 02, when we made the cup finals against one of Detroits historic teams , and I have been hooked ever since, learning more and more about the game over the years, and I wish I lived somewhere where water freezes on its on and could learn to skate

Playoff football is great. The NFL understands how to milk the last 2 minutes. But it in no way compares to the overall level that hockey maintains throughout a game. Even a game as lopsided as that. I don’t know too much about the NBA these days. I’ll tune in if Steph is in the finals, that’s it. NBA went screwball after the 90’s in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

We have a connection in the hockey operations office told me the Wednesday game was the best game the team played the entire season.

Wonder what he says about tonight.

Wednesday definitely took the cake. Tonight Fasty and Martinook kept us level. A less complete game even though we got more goals and less high danger on our net. Fasty better have a pharaoh style platform he’s carried around on until we go on Sunday. That dude was up and down the ice more than I think I’ve even seen him do before. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Also I gotta say, though the devils had more shots tonight. They had hardly any high danger shots. 

It just seemed like they had more shots because only one went in lol. Ap stats show Canes 35 SOG to devils 29.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
    • And you would've probably said the same thing about a lot of highly drafted WRs who busted.
    • dude..........   You are way to emotional here
×
×
  • Create New...