Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Been waiting for this... BY on QB School

TheCasillas

By TheCasillas,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

backINblack28 Proficient

backINblack28

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

thats a unique preseason look, you are not going to see that a lot in preseason football.

When referring to the Jets defensive scheme

a thousand times this. and we'll likely do something similar for a bounce back this week. it's all meaningless, but there's nuance beyond the struggle

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Crazy how 3 years of a consistent system helps which the Jets now have.

Matt Rhule and consistency were never a thing.

Yeah, the Jets Dline is a problem! They're gonna be hard to move the ball against getting consistent pressure without giving up a man in coverage. Remember when the Panthers had that? That unit kept the team in games when the offense had a hard time getting things going. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, rayzor said:

the problem is that this isn't something you should have to deal with in your first preseason game. 

every team has an agenda for each preseason game that may or may not include scheming. i really think the only reason the jets went hard was for team morale. we were just trying to get our guys out there and used to seeing a little action. 

i'm not going to give the jets props for anything that they did on saturday because they were going after a team that wasn't in it to win it. panthers were in it for the reps. 

Yep. Coaches should agree on how they're playing the game prior to the start. I know they do that to some degree during practice. 

Then again. Fans are paying to attend these GAMES. Perhaps preseason SHOULD be treated like games from a preparation stand point. A game with 2nd and 3rd stringers. Hard to prepare that way, but vanilla schemes and play calls are not what fans pay to see. Just a thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Yep. Coaches should agree on how they're playing the game prior to the start. I know they do that to some degree during practice. 

Then again. Fans are paying to attend these GAMES. Perhaps preseason SHOULD be treated like games from a preparation stand point. A game with 2nd and 3rd stringers. Hard to prepare that way, but vanilla schemes and play calls are not what fans pay to see. Just a thought. 

Fans are paying for them, but they aren't for the fans. These aren't GAMES. They are preseason games. There's a big difference. What the fans want should not factor into what the teams decide to do. Fans being in attendance should be irrelevant to the goals of preseason games. Fans going should know that what they are getting isn't a real game, more just a glorified practice. If they expect more, that shouldn't be a concern of the team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
Just now, rayzor said:

Fans are paying for them, but they aren't for the fans. Not those games. What tre fans want should not factor into what they decide to do. Fans being in attendance should be irrelevant to the goals of preseason games. Fans going should know that what they are getting isn't a real game, more just a glorified practice. If they expect more, that shouldn't be a concern of the team.

Ehhh... agree, not a team concern, but an NFL concern. If you're going to charge admission, albeit cheaper, then you should deliver what you advertise. Don't call it games and make it a big deal. Just call it a practice scrimmage and charge for concessions. I don't know. Just a thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, rayzor said:

And I'll say again, I don't want preseason games to be treated like real games.

If it doesn't count, don't act like it does. Risk of injury is too great for a meaningless game.

Treating it like a real game is honestly just stupid.

If you're not giving 100% on a football field, then you're already increasing your chances of injury. 100% effort should be a given. The only thing to debate is preparation and playcalling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Louie Grand Master

Louie

Posted
Posted

Despite the O line getting constantly stunted and beat, Bryce had great footwork and threw with anticipation. When is the last time we had a QB that had both of those? I don't ever remember. If we can get the O line problems ironed out (I am sure we will), our offense can getting rolling!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Grand Master

jfra78

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Navy_football said:

If you're not giving 100% on a football field, then you're already increasing your chances of injury. 100% effort should be a given. The only thing to debate is preparation and playcalling. 

I dont see where he said players shouldn't give 100% effort

The reasoning for vanilla playcalling is to see what you have in your players.  Scheming will lead to wondering if it's the players skill or the scheme

Edited by jfra78
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, jfra78 said:

I dont see where he said players shouldn't give 100% effort

The reasoning for vanilla playcalling is to see what you have in your players.  Scheming will lead to wondering if it's the players skill or the scheme

Yep. I can see that. I think I just interpreted it as such. 

Agree with keeping plays simple for the reason you suggested. It's just that you're not giving fans the real show. Just call it a practice scrimmage and charge for concessions. Don't charge fans to see a watered-down version of an NFL football game. Really was just playing devil's advocate cause I could see it both ways. Just a thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigpoppa Collaborator

bigpoppa

Posted
Posted

Compare the bryce video to this one on Fields and you can really see the difference in the 2 QBs. Fields threw 3 screens and none of them were accurate. Moore bailed him out on his as the throw was behind him and almost in the dirt. Fields threw 2 TDs but Bryce had the better QB play.

 

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

Steve Smith not a fan of the vanilla offense. Good point, how would adding a couple motions and basic play actions give away any of the playbook? Seems like it would be more beneficial to see how Bryce would handle those things live than be a detriment against future regular season game plans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By strato · Posted

      To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • UnluckyforSome
      2025 College Football Thread

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • CRA
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By CRA · Posted

      The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...