Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Sunday Ticket features announced by YouTube


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

I believe they’re looking into the ala carte model in the next couple seasons. I would totally pay 10 bucks a week to watch the Panthers. 

Yeah I think they would actually make some money off the people that currently watch bootleg streams as a last option. $400 is way too much for people only watching one team

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah I think they would actually make some money off the people that currently watch bootleg streams as a last option. $400 is way too much for people only watching one team

This x1000.

Call me Jack Sparrow cause I’ll be pirating games all year, I can’t afford to spend $400 for a football stream.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah I think they would actually make some money off the people that currently watch bootleg streams as a last option. $400 is way too much for people only watching one team

I always bought it with just the interest in watching our games, but we always end up watching whatever the best games are that week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made the change from Direct Tv to YouTube so I could watch my beloved Panthers since I have done since 2001.. YouTube Tv took a little bit to get use too.. two months later I like it. It knows what I like  .. plus the clarity is so much better and I had HD with Direct…. Just have to rely on my WiFi now.. so see how YouTube handles the mass streaming at first!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, amcoolio said:

It is still unlimited streams at once if on the same network, right? We switched to Youtube TV for our bar and its way better and way, way, cheaper than Direct TV. They don't check anymore and Google can give less a f if using in commercial establishment

Google may not care, but the NFL certainly does.  It may be rare and a small chance of it happening to you... but there are instances where bars have been cited for airing content illegally.

 

But yes, unlimited is still a thing.

Though if they see accounts with (let's say) 20 streams going... that might raise some "is this a business" eyebrows 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, joemac said:

I believe they’re looking into the ala carte model in the next couple seasons. I would totally pay 10 bucks a week to watch the Panthers. 

The NFL dictated the rule of no Ala Carte option.  Likely won't happen anytime soon, especially if YT keeps innovating features to make ST a desired way to watch games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, joemac said:

I believe they’re looking into the ala carte model in the next couple seasons. I would totally pay 10 bucks a week to watch the Panthers. 

I'm skeptical that the NFL will ever allow this to happen. You have too many people actually paying for the complete package, and a la carte may hurt the bottom line. Admittedly, I am one of those people who will likely never invest that type of money in watching football (unless I become an expat), but I'm thinking that there are more people like me than those willing to drop a half o' stack to watch NFL games (particularly in this digital age where there are likely other options...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PanthersATL said:

Google may not care, but the NFL certainly does.  It may be rare and a small chance of it happening to you... but there are instances where bars have been cited for airing content illegally.

 

But yes, unlimited is still a thing.

Though if they see accounts with (let's say) 20 streams going... that might raise some "is this a business" eyebrows 

Google may care a bit now since YTTV is run by Google. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

I'm skeptical that the NFL will ever allow this to happen. You have too many people actually paying for the complete package, and a la carte may hurt the bottom line. Admittedly, I am one of those people who will likely never invest that type of money in watching football (unless I become an expat), but I'm thinking that there are more people like me than those willing to drop a half o' stack to watch NFL games (particularly in this digital age where there are likely other options...)

There is a chance they'll offer "single game" options LATE in the season, similar to what DirecTV offered.  We won't know until it happens so don't hold your breath

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, amcoolio said:

It is still unlimited streams at once if on the same network, right? We switched to Youtube TV for our bar and its way better and way, way, cheaper than Direct TV. They don't check anymore and Google can give less a f if using in commercial establishment

Not saying this will help or hinder -- but if you're planning on using a home subscription in a commercial environment, there's a possibility you'll be limited to just two streams "outside the home"

and Google may have coding in place to identify whether a listed address is a "home" or a "business".

I'd be surprised if Google's YouTube product team haven't already thought of all the different ways that streams could be co-opted by folks trying to skirt various rules

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

There is a chance they'll offer "single game" options LATE in the season, similar to what DirecTV offered.  We won't know until it happens so don't hold your breath

DTV offered single game options late in the season last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...