Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football 2023


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

It will only be for basketball and football. It would bankrupt the women’s teams traveling across the country like that multiple times. 
 

but yeah man that’s where we are now. Stanford and Cal get California west coast market and SMU gets the ACC in to Texas. I’d like to see them add Cincy and UConn. 

It is so much more complex than the average fan thinks.  Again, I hope the ACC doesn’t do this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last post on this junk but this talk of Notre Dame joining the ACC is beyond ridiculous.  This will never happen period.  Them being an independent should probably be banned but they are in a perfect situation.  No other team can situate themselves to make the playoffs like Notre Dame.  It’s a different playing field

And let me predict it…they will make the playoff this year

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Hey pre-game he said it's about the players not the plays! Whatever that means

A rephrasing of Jimmy Johnson's famous line: "It's about the Jimmy's and Joe's, not the X's and O's".

If you have better players than the opposition, especially at this level, it doesn't matter how good their play calling is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...