Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers and Brian Burns not at all close to extension


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, 1v0 said:

Why? They are upset, because their demands are not met (disrespect). The team wants some more proof, that he will take the next step and he is worth what they demand.

I don't think I paintet a realistic scenario, but I am confident he will play and sign a contract with the Panthers.

 

 As "If I can think it, it can happen" posts. I've seen worse.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, 1v0 said:

How about a crazy thought? Both sides want to wait/ agreed to wait how the first game plays out. If he wrecks shop we will lean more towards his demand, of he is still only very good and situationally great, they meet more towards the front offices offer.

I believe Burns will be a long time Panther and he will experience much better years in the future of this team, than what he has to go trough on the past.

Let's bring them Birds down to earth!

Well, the first game is against the #3 rushing offense from last year and they only got better talent to run the ball.   It’s not really the type matchup for Burns to show his stuff.  It frankly is a matchup that plays into his weakness/liability. 

Burns would have a bad team working for him to make a deal on the results of that 

I’ll still be surprised if he plays with no deal.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, the first game is against the #3 rushing offense from last year and they only got better talent to run the ball.   It’s not really the type matchup for Burns to show his stuff.  It frankly is a matchup that plays into his weakness/liability. 

Burns would have a bad team working for him to make a deal on the results of that 

I’ll still be surprised if he plays with no deal.   

 

My heart says yes. But my brain says no. I hope my heart wins, we win, and Burns plays well. Fingers Crossed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, the first game is against the #3 rushing offense from last year and they only got better talent to run the ball.   It’s not really the type matchup for Burns to show his stuff.  It frankly is a matchup that plays into his weakness/liability. 

Burns would have a bad team working for him to make a deal on the results of that 

I’ll still be surprised if he plays with no deal.   

This

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope he plays because I want to see the dog in him. Let's see what he's made of when he's playing for something because the Panthers have played very few truly meaningful football games in his career and the one we had last year Burns went MIA. I want to see him come out and play like a man possessed. If he pouts and mails it in, just trade him because we found out he's not worth a cap crippling contract 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

We haven't played meaningful games because of Rhule and the QB situation.

 

Not sure why Burns is the scapegoat for the Bucs game. I remember our DB's kept getting burned deep by Evans. Burns wasn't the only player who didn't show up.

But Burns is the only one looking to become the 2nd highest paid at his position after the market was reset. 
 

if you want that kind of money show up and show out when it matters most

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

We haven't played meaningful games because of Rhule and the QB situation.

 

Not sure why Burns is the scapegoat for the Bucs game. I remember our DB's kept getting burned deep by Evans. Burns wasn't the only player who didn't show up.

 

I think it is a sitcom situation. Burns is top 10 at this. Yeah, but Tampa. Burns is top 10 in that. Yeah, but Tampa. It's almost a punch line anymore.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it’s been said plenty but about to turn into gameday and… it’s extremely deflating this fan base is focused on mismanagement of its front office and not the first game of a new era. 

personally I have to blame tepper. It starts with him and the fact that we are here is pathetic on this franchise. Every move we’ve made said burns is an untouchable, yet we can’t come to a fair agreement for both parties 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...