Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Against Atlanta


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 Lowest on Offense

-Young 31.4

-Sanders 47.7

-Thielen 53.9

3 Highest on Offense

-Hubbard 82.1

-Hurst 70.8

-Bozeman 68.6

3 Lowest on Defense

-DeShawn Williams 30.8
-Vonn Bell 38.4

-CJ Henderson 48.9

3 Highest on Defense

-Xavier Woods 69.5

-Derrick Brown 68.4

-Brian Burns 68.0

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It still boggles my mind we signed Vonn Bell over Bates.

Young's rating is more along the lines of what I expected from what I saw versus the revisionist hype a lot of people are pushing after the fact.  It was bad.

And I really liked the Thielen signing when it was made, but man...  it's starting to feel like the more data we get on him, the less I like it.  I hope he turns it around. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

It still boggles my mind we signed Vonn Bell over Bates.

Young's rating is more along the lines of what I expected from what I saw versus the revisionist hype a lot of people are pushing after the fact.  It was bad.

And I really liked the Thielen signing when it wad made, but man...  it's starting to feel like the more data we get on him, the less I like it.  I hope he turns it around. 

The young grade is kind of bullshit, IMO. Receivers didn't get separation at all. The first pick was more a bad route by hurst than a bad read/throw by Bryce. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

The young grade is kind of bullshit, IMO. Receivers didn't get separation at all. The first pick was more a bad route by hurst than a bad read/throw by Bryce. 

Well, I do also add the caveat that, as we know, PFF grades are kind of subjective bullshit.  But QBs are a little easier to evaluate than a lot of the other positions.  TBH, the whole offense looked a mess in respect to the passing game.  I was actually really surprised by how little we used compressed sets/route combos to free up guys by design.  I expected so much more of that compared to what we've seen the last 3 years, but alas, it looked very much the same dysfunctional mess.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

The young grade is kind of bullshit, IMO. Receivers didn't get separation at all. The first pick was more a bad route by hurst than a bad read/throw by Bryce. 

WRs weren't perfect but Young missed some throws when they did get separation and especially Mingo on that bomb where he beat the coverage by a couple steps.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

The young grade is kind of bullshit, IMO. Receivers didn't get separation at all. The first pick was more a bad route by hurst than a bad read/throw by Bryce. 

its bad man. I have some All-22 stuff coming. Im a bit deflated at the moment, but I have to give Bryce a bit of a leash since he is a rookie. However, it's Darnold bad.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

its bad man. I have some All-22 stuff coming. Im a bit deflated at the moment, but I have to give Bryce a bit of a leash since he is a rookie. However, it's Darnold bad.

I always appreciate the work and insight you share, brother...  I've been getting a ton of flack for my "takes" after the game on Bryce, but it amazes me how people blind themselves from objective observations based on their desired outcome.  Bryce just did not look or play good.  And again, for someone who was touted as a super processor, and that being the trait they really felt put him over the top compared to AR, what I saw Sunday was about as big of a letdown as I could've expected, even with reasonable expectations going in.

I look forward to it.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

It still boggles my mind we signed Vonn Bell over Bates.

I mean they aren't really comparable at all lol Bates got like 3x as much guaranteed and twice as much per year as Bell, wasn't like we chose 1 over the other, we were never in the market for a top paid safety

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...