Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy Vibes


WarHeel
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CRA said:

I mean there are similar aspects to Teddy’s game.  That’s just a reality.  Teddy was a first rounder too with his skill set. 

Agreed. Just an interesting observation as most on here hated Teddy with a burning passion by the end of his tenure here, with the most common citation from my recollection being his inability to make splash plays, especially down field.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Young can sling it. Elite arm strength is not there yet he's only 22. Off the charts physical ability isn't the end all be all anyway we saw that with Darnold. My issue is the same problems plagued us that have for the last few seasons. Our receivers are still struggling to gain separation and the ones who can are banged up and missing time. This is on our GM. He took enormous risks with this receiving core and traded away a hell of a lot for a young rookie QB.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WarHeel said:

I’ll reiterate, I’m well aware he was without Chark, and TMJR in particular was awful on multiple occasions. 

And yet you saw the need to title the thread “Teddy Vibes”. I saw a couple of the never Brycers make the comparison. Makes me think you didn’t watch when Bridgewater was here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Agreed. Just an interesting observation as most on here hated Teddy with a burning passion by the end of his tenure here, with the most common citation from my recollection being his inability to make splash plays, especially down field.

When people hear Teddy Bridgewater they envision tossing a weak pass at or behind the line of scrimmage when the team is down one or two possessions and the offense needs chunk plays. Bryce Young has played one regular season game. Safe to say it's very premature to even be mentioning Teddy right now.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WUnderhill said:

And yet you saw the need to title the thread “Teddy Vibes”. I saw a couple of the never Brycers make the comparison. Makes me think you didn’t watch when Bridgewater was here.

The chart itself gives me Teddy vibes, yes.

I watched every snap Teddy played. And I was very much neutral during the draft season, evenly split between Stroud and Young. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

risk adverse point guard type.   

it’s like the gunslinger tier.  It’s a wide range of QBs and they aren’t created equal.   Good and bad variety.

but Bryce Young will need weapons in the NFL.  Simple as that.  And he has really nothing.  And you want him to be able to finish drives and come in during clutch time.   But yeah, there are definitely some similarities in style of QB. 

if you got bland offensive skill talent you need a playmaker QB.  That’s a Cam.  

Nothing wrong with a risk adverse point guard.  You just want Bryce to be the high end version, which wasn’t Teddy.    

People hear point guard and think Steph Curry.  Steph is a playmaker.  Think more John Stockton. 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like everyone with an ax to grind are coming out of the woodwork to complain about their same old issues legitimate or not.

While I dont have an agenda, I am always glad to give my 2 cwntssolicited or otherwise

.What I saw was a quarterback who started off pretty well but after those picks became tentative and held the ball. Sometimes we had folks open early but Bryce held the ball hoping for more seperation which in fact gVe defenders time to recover. On those long balls Young was putting them way out in front rather than giving them air for the receiver to catch up if necessary.  Totally understandable for a  rookie qb playing in his first action.  Hopefully he will bounce back and play better on Monday night. I have heard it said that teams make the most progress between week 1 and 2.  We will see shortly.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...