Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 2 NFL games


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Yo @VarkingJustin Fields is not it. Can we agree there now?

I am leaning that way. Still not there yet. How did Claypool not fight for that? What has the line done to help at all? He is getting hit like every drop back. Some of that is on him. But there has been like four plays where the moment he hit his drop back he was hit already. I cant see any QB succeeding here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

I am leaning that way. Still not there yet. How did Claypool not fight for that? What has the line done to help at all? He is getting hit like every drop back. Some of that is on him. But there has been like four plays where the moment he hit his drop back he was hit already. I cant see any QB succeeding here. 

there are more moments where he drops back and just missed the read or quick pass. I dont get it. I just dont think Fields can process. Eberflus is going to need to potentialyl look elsewhere if he wants to save his job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

I am a Fields fan and it’s not looking good for him. Terrible team to get drafted by, but he hadn’t done himself any favors in processing/development. 

I don't understand why the Bears, or really any team for the most part, in 2023+ is looking to hire defensive coaches as the head coach. I want an offensive mind. I wasn't sold on the Colts coach but it looks like he can make an offense that supports a QB and doesn't make it hard on them. Eberflus probably shouldn't have been the hire. Especially if the defense still looks this bad. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

I don't understand why the Bears, or really any team for the most part, in 2023+ is looking to hire defensive coaches as the head coach. I want an offensive mind. I wasn't sold on the Colts coach but it looks like he can make an offense that supports a QB and doesn't make it hard on them. Eberflus probably shouldn't have been the hire. Especially if the defense still looks this bad. 

Agreed. That was my concern about Wilks. On a side note, the Bears defense hasn’t been much better…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...