Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To all those that kept saying Matt Moore was garbage


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

To all those that said that Jake gave us our best chance to win.

To all those that said that Moore's arm was extremely weak.

To all those that said that those of us calling for Jake to be benched back in Week 3 were having kneejerk reactions.

And most of all, to John Fox:

middlefinger pic

Mod note: against the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They turned Moore loose in the second half. He made all the throws! The scoreboard reflected!

SS89, YOUR ARE PERFECTLY CORRECT!!!! IS A DAMN GREAT NIGHT TO BE A PANTHERS FAN!!!!

Word man. Imma sleep easy tonight :D Haven't been this excited since Moore hit Smitty for 66 at the end of the tampa game. I'm looking forward to the game vs New York. Hope D Lo is back and ready to go tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol

Matt Moore's arm strength is still an issue and was still evident today

*goes to start a "to all those that kept saying John Fox has lost this team" thread

His armstrength is honestly fine for the kind of throws necessary. His deep throw to Smith that was a 46 yard completion (and closer to a 60 yard toss) was on the money along the sideline. I really think that a lot of his misses are: 1) inexperience, 2) not stepping into his throws due to #1, 3) not having the chemistry with his recievers yet.

He may not have the armstrength of the top Qbs, but it's good enough for many a deep completion.

BTW, that is not saying we shouldn't bring in competition in the offseason, no matter how he does in the last two games. Just saying, I think there is a bit of an overstatement to his arm strength being an issue, I really think a large part of that is technique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Panthers55 looks very foolish at best. Especially after saying Moore was given the victory against Tampa, yet never would say such a thing about Delhomme and would defend Delhomme when he had a bad game by blaming everyone else (such as the line or play calling, etc) except for Delhomme himself.

I also think those that said Moore was no better than Jake just look plain ol stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While this may have been their finest performance, this was not the only amazing game the defense has played... our D's rankings are far too low for how good they are... and the scary thing is, just think how good it could be if T.D. & our linemen weren't out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...