Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What has Scott Fitterer done right?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The most important supporting cast for the quarterback in his first season is the offensive line. We've got that.

The skill players come next, but I don't expect those to be further addressed until next season unless something surprising happens.

We could have used that draft ammunition this year and next.  Would we have to trade up next year for a QB if we went the weapons route instead drafting Bryce?  Sure, but the loss of future draft stock would have been in 2025 and beyond when the team would be more complete.  I totally get why we were impatient and went QB this draft, losing sucks especially amid roster uncertainty, but I honestly feel we jumped the gun by a season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, sure 😆

Basically, your view boils down to "I'll believe what I want to, facts be damned". If the reports don't match up to those beliefs, then you're just dismiss them because per your own words "David Tepper is right in the room with you".

You're also conveniently skipping over the fact that Tepper has defined his 'involvement". Specifically, he asks questions and tries to ensure that the process is solid, but neither makes nor tries to influence decisions regardless of his own feelings.

I'm surprised he didn't tell you that when he was sitting next to you 🤔

I mean, NFL teams aren't honest.  We know that.  You simply choose to treat Panther narratives they want set after the fact as the gospel.  I don't.  Have at it though. 

The Panthers would never say, yes, that reporting was correct.  Frank wanted X and Tepper wanted Y lol.  Every team is going to bullshit some agreement narrative 99% of the time.  Just like with each draft picks.  That kid is exactly who everyone wanted.  We all agreed.  He was #1 on everyone's board.   

You picking and choosing like the rest of us.  You just can't accept that.  I might listen to a long time NFL reporter.....but you are just listening to the Panther PR team.  You claiming one is fact.  I'm just acknowledging the reporter and that there are no real facts in most of these type discussions.  At least, while everyone is working together.  Real facts generally come out after everyone parts ways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

There has been a lot of bad, and quite a bit of good...IMO.

Mixing control with Tepper and Rhule was a mess, but with Tepper and Rhule, it was always going to be so...so I'm going to go with OK in his first 2 years.  He was HAMSTRUNG, but also seemed to make plenty of bad calls on his own....I think.

That said, I do like the trajectory of this team, and front office currently.

I like Samir, Dan, and Fitts as a team....getting a better feel for this FO every year.

I like our current coaching staffs, and I like the fact that he helped convince Tepper to overspend on the staff, overspend on getting some QC guys in place (Dom and Jim), and I like that we have cornerstone pieces on our defensive and offensive lines to build on.

Overall, the players have been a mixed bag, the contracts haven't been back breaking, but the direction that we are headed looks brighter than the past 10 years.

I'm keeping the guy a while longer to see how this plays out.

I get the impression that's probably happening anyway.

Fitterer and Reich are both "consensus" types and they seem to work well together. That alone can buy you a couple of years...at leastThe fact that we're also just starting out with a brand new quarterback also lends toward patience.

So despite the emotional screaming, I get a sense that our current braintrust might be around for a while.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

We could have used that draft ammunition this year and next.  Would we have to trade up next year for a QB if we went the weapons route instead drafting Bryce?  Sure, but the loss of future draft stock would have been in 2025 and beyond when the team would be more complete.  I totally get why we were impatient and went QB this draft, losing sucks especially amid roster uncertainty, but I honestly feel we jumped the gun by a season.

The whole "wait till next year" debate has been around for a while.

At some point, it actually has to be this year.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, NFL teams aren't honest.  We know that.  You simply choose to treat Panther narratives they want set after the fact as the gospel.  I don't.  Have at it though. 

The Panthers would never say, yes, that reporting was correct.  Frank wanted X and Tepper wanted Y lol.  Every team is going to bullshit some agreement narrative 99% of the time.  Just like with each draft picks.  That kid is exactly who everyone wanted.  We all agreed.  He was #1 on everyone's board.   

You picking and choosing like the rest of us.  You just can't accept that.  I might listen to a long time NFL reporter.....but you are just listening to the Panther PR team. 

This is your other tactic, suggesting that the people who say something other than what you believe are just parroting the team narrative, etc.

There have been plenty of times where what I thought happened turned out not to be what happened. No I could have stubbornly (and stupidly) said "nuh uh, I was still right anyway" but that'd be kind of silly.

The bottom line is you believe what you want to believe, facts be damned. You can accuse others of doing it all you want, but in reality that's just to make it easier to justify doing it yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

See that hole "wait till next year" debate has been around for a while.

At some point, it actually has to be this year.

Yep and next draft was the "this year" for me.  I just hope with the patchwork offensive supporting cast, there's enough for Young to work with and not stymie his development.  Right now our WRs are getting about as much separation as Siamese twins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

This is your other tactic, suggesting that the people who say something other than what you believe are just parroting the team narrative, etc.

There have been plenty of times where what I thought happened turned out not to be what happened. No I could have stubbornly (and stupidly) said "nuh uh, I was still right anyway" but that'd be kind of silly.

The bottom line is you believe what you want to believe, facts be damned. You can accuse others of doing it all you want, but in reality that's just to make it easier to justify doing it yourself.

It's not a tactic to acknowledge what NFL teams are and do.  It's just what they do.   Again, your tactic is to take whatever the Panthers put out there as the gospel.  I

But when legit NFL reporters and multiple ones are telling you X.  There is generally something there about X.  That's my stance.  And NFL teams don't like when reporters find out stuff they don't want aired out there.  And they often lie. 

I don't treat anything as the gospel.  There is enough smoke on the billionaire Tepper (and others like him) that he isn't the fan fiction version you tend to defend and create.  Sitting in the corner and just wanting to make sure everyone dotting the i.....and just letting everyone else run his mom and pop shop however they seem fit.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

It's not a tactic to acknowledge what NFL teams are and do.  It's just what they do.   Again, your tactic is to take whatever the Panthers put out there as the gospel.  I

But when legit NFL reporters and multiple ones are telling you X.  There is generally something there about X.  That's my stance.  And NFL teams don't like when reporters find out stuff they don't want aired out there.  And they often lie. 

I don't treat anything as the gospel.  There is enough smoke on the billionaire Tepper (and others like him) that he isn't the fan fiction version you tend to defend and create.  Sitting in the corner and just wanting to make sure everyone dotting the i.....and just letting everyone else run his mom and pop shop however they seem fit.  

Yeah, there aren't any legit NFL reporters out there I've seen pushing the narrative that Tepper is controlling everything. That's just you.

Plenty of reporters with no Panthers affiliation have confirmed stuff that happened while Rhule was here, but again you deny that because it doesn't suit the narrative you want.

As for me pushing a positive version of Tupper, yeah... 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Yep and next draft was the "this year" for me.  I just hope with the patchwork offensive supporting cast, there's enough for Young to work with and not stymie his development.  Right now our WRs are getting about as much separation as Siamese twins.

I get it, I just can't sign onto it.

Reich and company your franchise QB was to be had this year, and they did what was necessary to secure them.

It's going to be a long time before we know whether that worked out or not, but I don't disagree with making that choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Overall, the players have been a mixed bag, the contracts haven't been back breaking, but the direction that we are headed looks brighter than the past 10 years.

Past 5 I will give you but past 10 includes years we had way more talent and went to the Super Bowl. I would trade this team in a second for the 2013 team even with the next couple off seasons/drafts in a second if we could swap coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...