Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young only has 1.4 seconds to throw, before pocket collapses (Data was updated, numbers are off in OP)


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

Haven't looked. Will. But watching the replay earlier, and just estimating with a count, there were multiple times when it wasn't 1.8 secs. I would say over three on one sack. 

But hmmm. now that I look back on it, DL were probably breathing pretty hard after 1.8 seconds, so maybe?

yeah now that I take that into consideration, it definitely seems possible....  and no doubt there were jailbreaks too where it wasn't even 1.8 secs.

Not related to the link but I feel like the reason there is no deep passing game has a hefty element of planner/playcaller distrust in the OL to block it, mixed in there. Justified or not. This is an 'err on the side of safe', 'color inside the lines' bunch of walking bosses Tepper has hired.

Edited by stratocatter
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can present all evidence in the world that the offense around Bryce is a joke and it won’t matter. We had a QB who was surrounded by clowns but was still electric because of his physicality and that’s what this fanbase expects. And we spent his career arguing over whether it was his fault or the team’s whenever he struggled too.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

You can present all evidence in the world that the offense around Bryce is a joke and it won’t matter. We had a QB who was surrounded by clowns but was still electric because of his physicality and that’s what this fanbase expects. And we spent his career arguing over whether it was his fault or the team’s whenever he struggled too.

It was wild the sh!t people would nitpick Cam for as he balled out while being protected and surrounded by utter crap for the majority of his career

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MechaZain said:

You can present all evidence in the world that the offense around Bryce is a joke and it won’t matter. We had a QB who was surrounded by clowns but was still electric because of his physicality and that’s what this fanbase expects. And we spent his career arguing over whether it was his fault or the team’s whenever he struggled too.

Early Cam had extremely obvious arm talent. He was a national champion. I don't doubt Bryce’s intelligence or grit but right now the issue is we do not know if Young has or will ever have the physicality to consistently produce as a passer in this league long term.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryce has 2.6 seconds of pocket time and the NFL leader is Justin Fields at 2.8 seconds. Doesn’t seem that significant of a gap.  @TheCasillas I used the same site linked in the OP on Reddit.
 

Average time the QB had in the pocket between the snap and throwing the ball or pressure collapses the pocket, in seconds

IMG_4117.png

Edited by Varking
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

Early returns in the entire offense are terrible right now. They have to try something different and figure it out or they’ll be sending the Bears a top 5 pick 

I just ran the same report above using the link OP used and it says Bryce had 2.6 seconds. Right near the top of the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...