Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 5 NFL games


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hoenheim said:

Yeesh Dak has 1 td 3 ints meanwhile Purdy when 4 tds 0 ints 

It's going to be entertaining listening to undisputed and first take this week 🤣 

I can't lie I miss the Skip and Shannon Cowboy debates. Skip would get so pissed after a Cowboys loss lmao. They were pure comedy, such a shame Skip took it personal and attacked Shannon's character and credentials as a player.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I can't lie I miss the Skip and Shannon Cowboy debates. Skip would get so pissed after a Cowboys loss lmao. They were pure comedy, such a shame Skip took it personal and attacked Shannon's character and credentials as a player.

 

 

I don't miss it at all as it was too scripted imo. Skip is better with SAS on first take! And Skip with Irvin is better for Undisputed.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GhostWhispah said:

I admit when i am wrong too but j don't make any claims that make no sense whatsoever. Not a single sport analyst thought we would compete for the championship after losing our best playmaker Lol.

 

Fine beat me while im still dead.

 

I admitted I was wrong weeks ago. What more do I need to do?

 

*Also never said we could compete for a championship. That's just a flat out lie. I said we could win the division and beat any team not named San Fran or Philly. That is not contending for a championship if I admitted we wouldn't beat those teams. But keep going off.

Edited by CamWhoaaCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

The Rock shows up to your game you're not interested in what he does on the sideline?

 

But some random players mom and dad get shine you're perfectly fine with it.

 

Seems like we just have different styles. You more of the happy family perfect story kind of guy. I just like the entertainment part of the celebs. Taylor Swift and her swifties in the box going crazy after a Kelce TD is much more entertaining then Brock Purdy  mom and dad making him PB&J sandwiches in high school.

 

 

Celebrity fascination is just utterly bizarre to me if I'm being honest. But you do you 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Fine beat me while im still dead.

 

I admitted I was wrong weeks ago. What more do I need to do?

 

*Also never said we could compete for a championship. That's just a flat out lie. I said we could win the division and beat any team not named San Fran or Philly. That is not contending for a championship if I admitted we wouldn't beat those teams. But keep going off.

Wrong!!! You stated we will be competing for the championship as in the conference finals, NOT in the SB. If you do win the conference championship, you do go to the SB unless you assume we would lose to either Philly or SF. 

Its not unrealistic to compete for the division considering the weak competition we are in but when you lose your only playmaker on the team, that would be a challenge in itself unless you expect our top drafted QB super processing mind to conjure up ways to make players much more impactful than they are, impactful enough to match up against teams with multiple elite playmakers along with a top defense. Purdy even said it was a blessing having so many playmakers on his team after beating the Cowboys last night. It makes a big difference that our FO doesn't understand when trading DJ away who made Fields look legit for once.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GhostWhispah said:

Wrong!!! You stated we will be competing for the championship as in the conference finals, NOT in the SB. If you do win the conference championship, you do go to the SB unless you assume we would lose to either Philly or SF. 

Its not unrealistic to compete for the division considering the weak competition we are in but when you lose your only playmaker on the team, that would be a challenge in itself unless you expect our top drafted QB super processing mind to conjure up ways to make players much more impactful than they are, impactful enough to match up against teams with multiple elite playmakers along with a top defense. Purdy even said it was a blessing having so many playmakers on his team after beating the Cowboys last night. It makes a big difference that our FO doesn't understand when trading DJ away who made Fields look legit for once.

 

Bro let it go. I admitted I was wrong long ago. Time to talk about right now.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hornets shooting has definitely cooled off to end the season 
    • Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't, draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
×
×
  • Create New...