Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spider man Scrapped


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

They where all bad IMO

Mike Fleming and Nikki Finke have just confirmed that Sony Pictures decided today to reboot the Spider-Man franchise after franchise director Sam Raimi pulled out of Spider-Man 4 because he felt he couldn't make its summer release date and keep the film's creative integrity

http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/urgent-spider-man-4-scrapped-as-is-raimi-and-cast-out-franchise-reboot-planned/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitterne.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way to soon for a reboot. Best thing to do is shelve it for a while, then reboot it. It just seems cheap to remake a movie that's only 9 years old. Come on, at least give me a decade. How about instead of another Spiderman sequel, they put a little effort into the Deadpool movie so it doesn't end up like XMO:Wolverine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see a darker more dramatic version of Spider Man like how they turned Batman into what it is now from the Comic booky cartoony feel the other ones used to be (except maybe the very first.)

I hope so too.I know for the fantastic 4 reboot they want a darker movie but IDK about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way to soon for a reboot. Best thing to do is shelve it for a while, then reboot it. It just seems cheap to remake a movie that's only 9 years old. Come on, at least give me a decade. How about instead of another Spiderman sequel, they put a little effort into the Deadpool movie so it doesn't end up like XMO:Wolverine.

It's not really the same. Spider-Man rights are owned by Sony I believe, even though Marvel is involved Sony is the main guy. It wasn't until after the spider-man movies that Marvel started doing movies them selfs (Iron Man and Hulk).

And yes the spider-man movies sucked. You can't really make spider-man super dark anyway, but it could have been better and had better acting (Toby is horrible).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see a darker more dramatic version of Spider Man like how they turned Batman into what it is now from the Comic booky cartoony feel the other ones used to be (except maybe the very first.)

Not sure Spidey's character would fit into that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not going to be a complete reboot like Batman or Hulk, but more of a shift in direction and style.

Columbia Pictures originally signed on to make 6 spider man movies. I remember after the first one came out that the big rumor was they would likely end up being two trilogies. Where the first three would have one cast/style/director and the second three would have a completely different cast/style/director.

Personally I'm all for it. I thought Spider-Man 3 sucked bawls and could use a different take on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...