Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Wilks is a better coach than Frank Reich. And it's not even close.


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Dorian Gray said:

Feel free to bump this if Frank ever wins anything (he won't). We should've hired Wilks, and rode with Darnold + DJ + future draft capital. 

This is an absolute dumpster fire and lays squarely on David Tepper.

I am sad to say that I agree with you on this. Oh, how we were sold a bunch of lies. Reich was supposed to be the next great coach and Bryce was supposed to be some kind of genius. 

It is clear now that both of these statements are false. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dorian Gray said:

You literally just named the only two coaches who ever led this team to a Super Bowl. God you're an idiot. Please go away.

Fox, whos coaching worked 20 years ago, but then the NFL surpassed him. Rivera who was carried by Cam and Luke and when they no longer could, fell apart. Wilks just would not have worked either and wouldve been more of the same.  Youre basically wanting us to run a team just like  2 decades ago and youre the one calling someone an idiot loll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KillerKat said:

Fox, whos coaching worked 20 years ago, but then the NFL surpassed him. Rivera who was carried by Cam and Luke and when they no longer could, fell apart. Wilks just would not have worked either and wouldve been more of the same.  Youre basically wanting us to run a team just like  2 decades ago and youre the one calling someone an idiot loll.

"All wins are because of the players and all losses are because of the coaching" is certainly a garbage take, but you're entitled to it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Dorian Gray said:

Feel free to bump this if Frank ever wins anything (he won't). We should've hired Wilks, and rode with Darnold + DJ + future draft capital. 

This is an absolute dumpster fire and lays squarely on David Tepper.

Said this the moment we hired Frank.

 

Tepper is simply a dumbass when it comes to picking coaches.

 

Next coach he should just stay the fug out the way!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dorian Gray said:

"All wins are because of the players and all losses are because of the coaching" is certainly a garbage take, but you're entitled to it.

Yeah because Rivera totally wasnt about to get fired before Cam entered his prime and then when Cam was given no help and forced to do all the work, finally broke down and Rivera couldnt do anything anymore. You are right, none of that happened lol.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Bluetooth said:

this is the karma for not going with Wilks(If frank didn't play for the Panthers would he even had been in the discussion, I think it was a PR move. Hey get the white guy with ties to the community to offset Wilks hold on em)

You mean Nicole Tepper? She was in on both Reich and Young. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

Yeah because Rivera totally wasnt about to get fired before Cam entered his prime and then when Cam was given no help and forced to do all the work, finally broke down and Rivera couldnt do anything anymore. You are right, none of that happened lol.

Wonder who the coach was who drafted Cam? Or who put together that defense? Rivera had plenty of deficiencies, like all coaches do, but built a damn solid team here until Gettleman got cheap af and sold them all off. Unless you think we're luring Andy Reid here, a coach who can get the most out of our personnel was our best bet. And Wilks showed he could do that. Sorry he's not exciting enough for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Or just picked the right coach. Neither are the answer.

Doesn’t matter if Wilks was right or not. He had the locker room, if we gave him his own staff(something he didn’t have in Arizona) and worked for building capital we’d be in a bunch better position than we are now. 
 

 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Nah Rivera was 1000000% carried by Cam and Luke. He'll be available very soon btw.

And Andy Reid didn't win a Super Bowl until Mahomes. And Belichick has looked like ass without Brady. And Phil Jackson never won without Jordan or Kobe. It's almost like you need to find great players to succeed.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...