Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reich should be fired now


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, App Panther said:

The game management after Sanders first down was awful.

We had 1:49 left and 3 timeouts. They were starting to blitz heavy. Mix in a run or RB screen. Plenty of time with only half the field to go.

Instead we throw 3 straight times, one of which being a wildly overthrown 30 yard pass.

 

Frank needs to give up playcalling!!!!  Wait.... 

Yep, that failed 2nd down pass attempt all but sealed the game. I knew it in my gut as soon as it happened.  Chicago was letting us have the short stuff, but no, tried to take a shot when CLEARLY that's not our offenses *cough* Bryce's *cough* strong suit.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MGH1989 said:

It is embarrassing to be the team and owner who fires coaches constantly, but does anyone think there is path forward with Reich? I understand the line sucks and the lack of weapons (which is on Fit and Reich to a degree), but this offense shows no innovation or adherence to playing to the strengths of its players and giving our rookie QB the best opportunity to be successful. Will it really be that much better even if with better players? I don't see how it can. 

If there was ever a case of "we need to fire a coach after 1 year", its this one. I don't think anyone would even raise hell about it. 

Edited by roaddog96
correction
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mage said:

With all due respect, I find this to be a little goofy if I'm right about where this is headed.  I hate to be that person and I'm embarrassed about the Panthers too but its just sports... more important things in the world to march the streets about, assuming that is what they are meaning.  And marching the streets to get people fired seems a little insensitive.

The best way to show the Panthers our displeasure is to just stop attending games.  

This. Tepper is a multi billion dollar hedge fund manager who makes money hand over fist as an owner. He doesn’t give a poo about a few hundred fans crying over a bullhorn on mint street. The only way to get his attention is to stop going to games and buying his concessions.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

I'm thinking Tepper goes after Lions OC Ben Johnson (who was his #1 choice last offseason) and gives him the key to the team

And he's going to wanna take a job with a 5'10" qb and no 1st round draft pick? Have fun coming up with a game plan where you can't run qb sneak or a convincing play action scheme 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...