Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reich current highest odds to be first HC fired this season

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted

image.png.fda4f4f1f814a8df924b8713a4d0c078.png

So we haven't been using bubble screens?  What team have I been watching the past 9 weeks who uses a sh*t ton of bubble screens?  RPOs only work if you have an effective running game.  We do not. 

So what was the point of this article again?  Oh yeah, we suck and no one is happy. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Camp Fodder said:

Is it possible that Tepper knows he pushed for Brice and blames himself more than Fitterer and Reich and that’s why he hasn’t fired them?

That would take humility and I don't think Tepper knows what that is.  If he gave Rhule, who obviously had no clue what he was doing, that amount of leash then Reich should at least get a second season.  If coaches got routinely canned after a less than productive first season, the turnover in the NFL would be even higher than it is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Prickles Grand Master

Ricky Prickles

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, WhoKnows said:

He really hasn’t. He’s had more good plays than Young, but he’s been in the NFL for years now. He was supposedly tearing poo up in the offseason but sometimes you feel like the coaches having training wheels on him and then other times he’ll make some awful throws. Again, he’s shown more highlights than we have have but he’s a 25 year old in his 4th season.

Well, I guess its time to sell now and accept my losses before they get worse. Thats a bummer as I thought he would do something big this season. Thanks for the heads up!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

Do you really think so or just kidding? I hope you are right if you are being serious

I think so, yeah.  It reminds me of the 49ers game from last year.  I'm still 100% convinced that Tepper only fired Rhule when he did rather than EOY because of how bad it was at that game, not just the result but also the crowd (or lack thereof for the Panthers).  This game will be an even worse version of that.  The stadium is going to be FILLED with Cowboys fans.  It will be an embarrassing look for the organization.  Not only that but are going to get beatdown.  

Also before that 49ers game is when the heat really started to turn up on Rhule, not just among Panthers fans but in national media.  Same is happening to Reich now.  So the thought is already in Tepper's head.  And we're talking about an owner who is willing to cut ties during the season. 

I could be wrong.  Just what my gut thinks.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 11/11/2023 at 2:00 PM, kungfoodude said:

Bill will get to retire on his timeline, provided he doesn't take the controls and nosedive for the next couple of years.

Yep, this recent talk of firing him is just beyond insane to me. Is he struggling? yes. Also he got to the AFC championship nearly each year during those 20 years, that was the floor.......the AFC championship..... In the hardest eras, he won 6 SBs in which they where facing the favorite/best offense that year. A fluke helmet catch and hed have 18-0 record and the 7th SB.

Hes always had a top 10 defense and few times it was ranked #1. When NFL changed all the rules for scoring, Bill was holding teams to 16 points and the next best mid-20s. Just insane to talk of his "firing" imo. NFL DCs just copy his game plans cause they have worked. 

Hes even able to have alllll that success while drafting in the late 20s/32 alll those years and he sucked at that...

This should never been a topic. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...