Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 QB Watch…


*FreeFua*
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 11/13/2023 at 5:23 PM, 45catfan said:

Ugh, unless he's grown up, he has some serious maturity issues.  I don't keep up withe Gamecock football, but that was a knock on him at Oklahoma.  Maybe he's changed.

I live right next door to Rattler and see all the games and hear all the buzz. He has done nothing at all to warrant any criticism as far as maturity. He has been a model citizen, player, leader and team representative. The young man has matured and been a solid all around student athlete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2024 at 2:49 AM, heel31ok said:

Nope

If you are speaking of his maturity, he has done nothing bad and maturity has been top notch here at USC. I practically see him everyday and he has been a wonderful leader. His maturity is no longer in question.

Edited by Ricky Prickles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

As I see it, one more deeper for 2025 because there's no way Tepper will sign off on a QB at #33 in April.

True, but unless he transfers, this most likely keeps Arch Manning from starting at Texas. And Manning is someone people have been hoping would be the next great QB for a few years now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

With Ewers and maybe McCarthy returning, I anticipate Ward and Pratt hype trains developing.  

I am higher on Ewers than McCarthy.  McCarthy had everything a QB could ever need a Michigan: WRs, RBs and a stellar OL.  I don't see him as a QB that can put an inferior offense on his back and carry them in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...