Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank given the option to change?


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

I mean, Tepper certainly alluded to each  firing having its own unique reasoning to it.  All this certainly sounds plausible.  Dinosaur Frank simply unwilling to bend what he does on O for a rookie QB.  And that matches the eyeball test as well as echos critiques folks like 89 were hammering yesterday. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, travisura said:

So they fired him for not running something that he's never historically run. This is on Tepper and the FO for not knowing who they hired and the system he runs, and saddling him with a QB that doesn't fit that system. This organization is something else, I tell ya.

False

 

Screenshot_20231129_083715_Chrome.jpg

Edited by BY9Franchise
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, travisura said:

So what's changed between now and then that is making him unwilling to incorporate RPO now?

No idea probably lack of talent.... Him and Doug Peterson made the RPO a thing in 2017 when the Eagles won the SB your not the first one to say that either it seems to be a common misconception here that's what he was hired to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, travisura said:

So they fired him for not running something that he's never historically run. This is on Tepper and the FO for not knowing who they hired and the system he runs, and saddling him with a QB that doesn't fit that system. This organization is something else, I tell ya.


100% true. They should have seen how bad his teams in Indy got and how he refused to change.

It’s also on Frank for not pushing for Stroud (if any of that is really true). If he did want a different QB, it certainly sounds like he didn’t fight for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tbe said:


100% true. They should have seen how bad his teams in Indy got and how he refused to change.

It’s also on Frank for not pushing for Stroud (if any of that is really true). If he did want a different QB, it certainly sounds like he didn’t fight for it.

100% false he made the RPO a thing he HAS EXPERIENCE with it heck he was the "primary innovator at the NFL level" 

 

Screenshot_20231129_083715_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MechaZain said:

Said this in another thread but I have a hard time believing Frank was bullied into betting his career on a QB he didn't want and then grew a spine when asked to run some RPOs. 

Grew a spine when asked to run RPOs the same thing he road to a SB win as the coordinator of Eagles.... when the bs he was running obviously wasn't working...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MechaZain said:

Said this in another thread but I have a hard time believing Frank was bullied into betting his career on a QB he didn't want and then grew a spine when asked to run some RPOs. 

Yeah they are running wild with these guesses. Tepper and Reich have plenty of issues without the media trying to create more. My guess is he did incorporate some RPO, I mean I saw a few ran on Sunday, but didn’t dial it up nearly enough before it didn’t flow with what he was calling on the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BY9Franchise said:

No idea probably lack of talent.... Him and Doug Peterson made the RPO a thing in 2017 when the Eagles won the SB your not the first one to say that either it seems to be a common misconception here that's what he was hired to do.

Chip Kelly brought it to the league, and we were running RPO with Cam before 2017, but your point stands. It just doesn't add up that if he's known for an RPO offense, he would refuse to utilize one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...