Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nicole Tepper

Pazhoosier89

By Pazhoosier89,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

d-dave Grand Master

d-dave

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

So we're now making football decisions based on women's intuition. I don't even... 

To be fair, how many wars have women started versus men?  Who makes up the majority of sex offenders?

Based on what has come out from the Reich firing fallout, it seems as if Dave Tepper wants to get a lot of input from a lot of different perspectives.  Is that good?  Maybe?  Hasn't looked good.  His wife?  Look, we have no idea who she is outside of some blurby PR stuff.  As others have said: her history prior to being Mrs. Tepper was thoroughly purged.

Is she a good judge of character?  Does she have a human resources background?  Again, we don't know what perspective she brings.  What does she add to the room?  I have no idea.  I think instead of asking why she's in the room to begin with, we should be asking if her input has had any value?

Some posters here believe she's using the Panthers as her own sex party.  I really doubt that, but feel free to find some proof of it.  

I think Dave trusts his wife's opinion.  He includes her because he's the owner and he gets to make those choices.  This is again why we need a Football Czar/President to actually run this stuff instead of the meddling owner and his wife.  As of now: the results haven't been good.  We need football professionals in the room, not super fans with deep pockets.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, d-dave said:

To be fair, how many wars have women started versus men?  Who makes up the majority of sex offenders?

Based on what has come out from the Reich firing fallout, it seems as if Dave Tepper wants to get a lot of input from a lot of different perspectives.  Is that good?  Maybe?  Hasn't looked good.  His wife?  Look, we have no idea who she is outside of some blurby PR stuff.  As others have said: her history prior to being Mrs. Tepper was thoroughly purged.

Is she a good judge of character?  Does she have a human resources background?  Again, we don't know what perspective she brings.  What does she add to the room?  I have no idea.  I think instead of asking why she's in the room to begin with, we should be asking if her input has had any value?

Some posters here believe she's using the Panthers as her own sex party.  I really doubt that, but feel free to find some proof of it.  

I think Dave trusts his wife's opinion.  He includes her because he's the owner and he gets to make those choices.  This is again why we need a Football Czar/President to actually run this stuff instead of the meddling owner and his wife.  As of now: the results haven't been good.  We need football professionals in the room, not super fans with deep pockets.

As to the first 2 questions, there's no way to know. I'm not even sure what that even remotely has to do with the topic. 

It's an absolutely justified question to ask why is she in the room. What qualifications does she have to would make her the appropriate choice vs the hundreds of thousands of other female executives in the work place? It's usually very easy to find the work history and experience of women in that powerful of a position. Nicole has none that we have seen. 

The quote says her input has been key in making several of the right decisions. We'll at 1-10 with the HC fired, our traded for QB looking atrocious, and nearly every other decision looking like the wrong one, I'd say there is no reason to believe that she has any business being in that room. 

Dave can include her all he wants to, but he hasn't shown he should be making those decisions either. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

So we're now making football decisions based on women's intuition. I don't even... 

Did you ever notice how that Frank guy never showed any emotion.  There's just something about him Dave.  We got to have him.  And that Bryce fella.  So cute.  I could put him in my pocket and take him home. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...