Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nicole Tepper


Pazhoosier89
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

So we're now making football decisions based on women's intuition. I don't even... 

To be fair, how many wars have women started versus men?  Who makes up the majority of sex offenders?

Based on what has come out from the Reich firing fallout, it seems as if Dave Tepper wants to get a lot of input from a lot of different perspectives.  Is that good?  Maybe?  Hasn't looked good.  His wife?  Look, we have no idea who she is outside of some blurby PR stuff.  As others have said: her history prior to being Mrs. Tepper was thoroughly purged.

Is she a good judge of character?  Does she have a human resources background?  Again, we don't know what perspective she brings.  What does she add to the room?  I have no idea.  I think instead of asking why she's in the room to begin with, we should be asking if her input has had any value?

Some posters here believe she's using the Panthers as her own sex party.  I really doubt that, but feel free to find some proof of it.  

I think Dave trusts his wife's opinion.  He includes her because he's the owner and he gets to make those choices.  This is again why we need a Football Czar/President to actually run this stuff instead of the meddling owner and his wife.  As of now: the results haven't been good.  We need football professionals in the room, not super fans with deep pockets.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, d-dave said:

To be fair, how many wars have women started versus men?  Who makes up the majority of sex offenders?

Based on what has come out from the Reich firing fallout, it seems as if Dave Tepper wants to get a lot of input from a lot of different perspectives.  Is that good?  Maybe?  Hasn't looked good.  His wife?  Look, we have no idea who she is outside of some blurby PR stuff.  As others have said: her history prior to being Mrs. Tepper was thoroughly purged.

Is she a good judge of character?  Does she have a human resources background?  Again, we don't know what perspective she brings.  What does she add to the room?  I have no idea.  I think instead of asking why she's in the room to begin with, we should be asking if her input has had any value?

Some posters here believe she's using the Panthers as her own sex party.  I really doubt that, but feel free to find some proof of it.  

I think Dave trusts his wife's opinion.  He includes her because he's the owner and he gets to make those choices.  This is again why we need a Football Czar/President to actually run this stuff instead of the meddling owner and his wife.  As of now: the results haven't been good.  We need football professionals in the room, not super fans with deep pockets.

As to the first 2 questions, there's no way to know. I'm not even sure what that even remotely has to do with the topic. 

It's an absolutely justified question to ask why is she in the room. What qualifications does she have to would make her the appropriate choice vs the hundreds of thousands of other female executives in the work place? It's usually very easy to find the work history and experience of women in that powerful of a position. Nicole has none that we have seen. 

The quote says her input has been key in making several of the right decisions. We'll at 1-10 with the HC fired, our traded for QB looking atrocious, and nearly every other decision looking like the wrong one, I'd say there is no reason to believe that she has any business being in that room. 

Dave can include her all he wants to, but he hasn't shown he should be making those decisions either. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

So we're now making football decisions based on women's intuition. I don't even... 

Did you ever notice how that Frank guy never showed any emotion.  There's just something about him Dave.  We got to have him.  And that Bryce fella.  So cute.  I could put him in my pocket and take him home. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tanking in the NFL isn’t really a thing and anybody wanting to bring the rigged lottery to the NFL has an ulterior motive.
    • I understand where you're coming from, but we need another safety IMHO. Other positions, especially on defense, dont have ideal depth, but to me at least S is the one position we can't stand pat at even when thinking about the future
    • 100%. Nick Scott was awful last year. Like, even for a franchise that hasn't historically invested in that position, it stood out for how awful it was. If he sees meaningful snaps at S again we're cooked.  Maybe he has value for ST, but I certainly hope we can upgrade. Jordan Fuller, who was by all accounts an Evero guy, was almost as bad. Xavier Woods was bad, but not complete garbage. Still did not want him back. Those 3 guys seriously may have been the worst S group in the NFL. And they all were brought in, especially Fuller, as good fits for this system. Everyone knocks the defensive line, and they deserve a lot of blame, too, but so, so many times our safeties inability to tackle let 4-5 yard runs turn into 10+. And it happened over and over and over again if you watch the film. Honestly, Demani Richardson was the only S by the end of the year I remember making positive plays. I have no issue with Richardson being in the mix and/or competing to be a starter, but we still need another S desperately IMHO who has actually played meaningful snaps in the NFL. The only caveat/excuse for our secondary was the fact our pass rush was nonexistent for large stretches last year. Maybe that helps with coverage, but I dont see how that makes any of these guys better at tackling.  I know it somewhat feels like piling on at this point, but I feel 100% confident in saying this was the worst tackling team in franchise history. The 70ish yard pass play we gave up to Jamarr Chase where he ran through and past everyone in the secondary has to be up there in terms of most embarrassing plays I've ever seen. I can't imagine how embarrassed Kuechly must have been watching from the booth... I think bringing back Evero was a mistake, but for a team that has had nothing but change over the past 5 years, I'm willing to see this through. I definitely think we added significantly to the floor of this defense with the additions we made. I dont think Evero has any further excuses if he cant field a unit that can at least somewhat hold their own. Fixing the safety play is going to be a big part of that.
×
×
  • Create New...