Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cornerbacks


tarheelpride

Recommended Posts

I think time on the bench with his injury was good for godfrey. He never really got a chance to sit back and observe what to do with the safety position, he was thrust in there as a rookie and told to produce. he was sucking at the beginning of the year, but after he came back, he came back with a vengeance. I remember reading an article about him and his injury and how he was getting different looks at defenses and situations observing them rather than being a part of them. It seemed to help a lot and i think he did great after that fact.

I'd have no problem with him at starting FS next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is interesting that the general consensus is that both Godfrey and Martin have good skill sets that need to be developed. And that Godfrey played well at the end of the year. I can remember how many people roasted Fox for putting Godfrey back in and used it as an example of how his blind loyalty was a severe liability and limited our chances to win. I guess he knew something the casual fan didn't when he put Godfrey back in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah for the first time since Minter I'm pretty psyched about our safety situation. Godfrey played much better at the end of the year, and Martin looked very good in his short stint. It is always good to have solid depth at the position. I think Martin is a more natural free safey, where as Godfrey would be bettter suited at strong safety, but Harris is a good leader and a good player.

As far as corners I'm going to be the first one to say it: I'm not really that sold on any of them. I think they are all solid, but if we lost one of them, and got a true-shutdown guy, I think our past defense would be one of the best in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our secondary is very young and very solid. That is a rather rare situation, but a very good one. Captain probably needs another year before he gets the #2 spot, but he for sure is a competitor. He covered some very, very good receivers this year and did rather well. Marshall and Gamble are solid and dont really give up big plays. I think the biggest problem we have is the FS position and thats because we have two good players and 1 spot. I would like to see some packages that can try and get them both on the field at the same time. Using them situationally though is an awful idea. Teams will identify weakness' and whenever those two switched in and out, try to exploit them. When you dont start and then are thrown in there say 2nd quarter, it generally takes a few plays to get accustomed to the pace of the game and that can cause you to give up a big play. So they need to find ways to use both because they are ball hawks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as long as we keep marshall and wesley i'm pretty happy with our DBs.

i wouldn't mind brining in competition for CB, FS, and SS but there are bigger needs elsewhere. if we can affors to have solid depth brought in, that would be a good thing. any depth that we have there should be ST players first and foremost, though.

btw...munnerlyn doesn't play nickel when he's in. marshall does. when munnerlynn is out, marshall lines up on the right side. munnerlynn comes in and marshall moves inside to cover the slot while captain covers the right side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about at SS? Chris Harris is a rock but how would you feel if we spent a high draft pick (2nd - 3rd) on a Safety?

And what do you look for in a safety? (other than speed)

I want us to draft a hard hitting SS in the later rounds to give us another Harris.

I think it would be interesting to put Godfrey and Martin at FS and SS on certain situations and give us some versatility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...