Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mrs. Thomas Brown: "We're already fired"


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Frank9999 said:

I am willing to bet TB is not happy about her tweet 

I wouldn’t be and if he is a man you are probably right. Nothing wrong with your better half getting your back but to make a juvenile, entitled post like that in the twittersphere was not the time nor place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frank9999 said:

Idk man, maybe I am in the minority but I actually think yesterday as a whole was one of our better called games on offense outside of maybe a couple short yardage plays. But even then like the play to Blackshear was there, he just fell down.  

tons of plays in the passing game were there to be made and just dropped balls or inaccurate throws. Ran for 200 yards. 

Ran for over 200 yards, then called pass plays on short yardage, including from the 1 yard line.

That's not what I'd consider "a well-called game".

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Ran for over 200 yards, then called pass plays on short yardage, including from the 1 yard line.

That's not what I'd consider "a well-called game".

If we ran it and got stuffed I guarantee people would be saying “oh they knew the run was coming ! “ and acting like we should have passed it 

Edited by Frank9999
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, 4Corners said:

I’d fire his ass first thing tomorrow. His wife basically saying he is just there stealing paychecks. 
 

Brown is horrible. 

Thats everyone working for Tep. They saw what happened with Wilks. Why even try? What do you want him to do exactly with Young and a 1-11 team? I actually liked Young out there (trying) to throw bombs downfield. At the very least they have a better idea of what he is and isn’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frank9999 said:

If we ran it and got stuffed I guarantee people would be saying “oh they knew the run was coming ! “ and acting like we should have passed it 

At least trying that still would have been better than what they did, especially if they hadn't gone shotgun.

The fourth and one where they went shotgun with an empty backfield was particularly bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...