Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fitterer - the athletic


mrcompletely11
 Share

Recommended Posts

fug you fat fitt, you are one dumb motherfuger.  I mean truly one of the worst GM's the nfl has ever seen.   

 

https://theathletic.com/5150382/2023/12/20/panthers-gm-scott-fitterer-future/

Pretty fair article from Person as usual

 

The burns and corral piece of this is truly baffling

The bad

Turning down the Los Angeles Rams’ offer for Brian Burns

The Panthers were in transition mode last year at the trade deadline. Tepper had fired Rhule two weeks earlier and Fitterer had already moved All-Pro running back Christian McCaffrey and wide receiver Robbie Anderson ahead of the deadline (more on both of those later).

But the deal that looks questionable a year later is the one Fitterer didn’t make. The Rams offered two future first-round picks — in 2024 and ’25 — plus a third in ’23 for Burns, who was in the midst of a career-best, 12 1/2-sack season. Trading Burns would have left the Panthers without their best player on a defense that has kept them in a lot of games the past two seasons.

But the Panthers might have been able to flip the two firsts to Chicago, allowing them to trade for the No. 1 pick without giving up their own first in ’24 and wideout DJ Moore, who would have been an invaluable weapon for rookie quarterback Bryce Young.

Advertisement

The decision to keep Burns was further complicated by the Panthers’ inability to sign him to a long-term contract. With Fitterer unwilling to meet Burns’ contract demands — around $30 million a year, according to sources — Burns essentially cut off negotiations once the season started and likely will be looking at a franchise tag this offseason.

Moving on from Christian McCaffrey

This was a tough call for Fitterer and the organization because of how effective the multi-talented McCaffrey is when healthy. But the 2017 first-round pick had played in only 10 games in 2020 and ’21 and the big money on his contract was about to hit in ’23.

San Francisco gave up four picks for McCaffrey, although none was a first-round selection. The Panthers used a second from the 49ers in the deal to acquire the first overall pick from Chicago. They packaged a third and fourth from the Niners to trade up for Oregon edge rusher DJ Johnson with the 80th overall pick, considered a reach by most draft experts. Johnson has 14 tackles and no sacks in 10 games.

Meanwhile, McCaffrey has yet to miss a game with San Francisco, leads the NFL in rushing and should get MVP votes while playing for Kyle Shanahan, who babysat McCaffrey and his brothers as a teenager and runs an offense well-suited for McCaffrey’s skill set. With each 100-yard or multi-touchdown game, it seems clear the Panthers didn’t get enough for McCaffrey, who — like Moore — would have been a godsend to a rookie QB.

This year’s free-agent group

Given control of the 53 after Reich’s arrival, Fitterer had the final say in personnel decisions this year. The results have been underwhelming. The Panthers were the only team to pay a free-agent running back, and Miles Sanders has not made much of a case for more spending at the position in the future.

Advertisement

Sanders, who signed a four-year, $25.4 million contract, has become an afterthought behind Chuba Hubbard while struggling to get untracked. Tight end Hayden Hurst had not found much of a role before suffering a season-ending concussion at Chicago on Nov. 9, while DJ Chark has failed to emerge as a consistent vertical stretch.

The Panthers on Tuesday released veteran edge rusher Justin Houston, who managed a half-sack in seven games before getting hurt. Reich wanted to bring Houston in for his leadership and productivity, while former running backs coach Duce Staley is said to have backed the signings of Sanders and Chark. But Fitterer had to sign off on all of them.

 

Trading up for Matt Corral

Former Panthers GM Dave Gettleman used to warn against “shopping hungry,” which is what the Panthers did during the 2022 draft while looking to upgrade the QB position (after previously missing out on Matthew Stafford and Deshaun Watson). The Panthers talked to the Cleveland Browns during the draft about trading for Baker Mayfield, while thinking about taking a shot on a mid-round quarterback.

After Malik Willis went to Tennessee in the third round, the Panthers traded up for Matt Corral, the Ole Miss quarterback who had not interviewed well and exhibited “unreliable behavior” in college, according to the NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport. The Panthers took Corral over former UNC quarterback Sam Howell, who has started 14 games for Washington this year, and the Niners’ Brock Purdy, who, in fairness, was not viewed as a mid-round prospect.

Corral sustained a season-ending foot injury during a preseason game as a rookie, and was released during final cuts before this season. Corral signed with New England before leaving the team before Week 1 for a personal matter. He has not resurfaced for as much as a tryout since.

  • Pie 7
  • Flames 2
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

fug you fat fitt, you are one dumb motherfuger.  I mean truly one of the worst GM's the nfl has ever seen.   

 

https://theathletic.com/5150382/2023/12/20/panthers-gm-scott-fitterer-future/

Pretty fair article from Person as usual

 

The burns and corral piece of this is truly baffling

The bad

Turning down the Los Angeles Rams’ offer for Brian Burns

The Panthers were in transition mode last year at the trade deadline. Tepper had fired Rhule two weeks earlier and Fitterer had already moved All-Pro running back Christian McCaffrey and wide receiver Robbie Anderson ahead of the deadline (more on both of those later).

But the deal that looks questionable a year later is the one Fitterer didn’t make. The Rams offered two future first-round picks — in 2024 and ’25 — plus a third in ’23 for Burns, who was in the midst of a career-best, 12 1/2-sack season. Trading Burns would have left the Panthers without their best player on a defense that has kept them in a lot of games the past two seasons.

But the Panthers might have been able to flip the two firsts to Chicago, allowing them to trade for the No. 1 pick without giving up their own first in ’24 and wideout DJ Moore, who would have been an invaluable weapon for rookie quarterback Bryce Young.

Advertisement

The decision to keep Burns was further complicated by the Panthers’ inability to sign him to a long-term contract. With Fitterer unwilling to meet Burns’ contract demands — around $30 million a year, according to sources — Burns essentially cut off negotiations once the season started and likely will be looking at a franchise tag this offseason.

Moving on from Christian McCaffrey

This was a tough call for Fitterer and the organization because of how effective the multi-talented McCaffrey is when healthy. But the 2017 first-round pick had played in only 10 games in 2020 and ’21 and the big money on his contract was about to hit in ’23.

San Francisco gave up four picks for McCaffrey, although none was a first-round selection. The Panthers used a second from the 49ers in the deal to acquire the first overall pick from Chicago. They packaged a third and fourth from the Niners to trade up for Oregon edge rusher DJ Johnson with the 80th overall pick, considered a reach by most draft experts. Johnson has 14 tackles and no sacks in 10 games.

Meanwhile, McCaffrey has yet to miss a game with San Francisco, leads the NFL in rushing and should get MVP votes while playing for Kyle Shanahan, who babysat McCaffrey and his brothers as a teenager and runs an offense well-suited for McCaffrey’s skill set. With each 100-yard or multi-touchdown game, it seems clear the Panthers didn’t get enough for McCaffrey, who — like Moore — would have been a godsend to a rookie QB.

This year’s free-agent group

Given control of the 53 after Reich’s arrival, Fitterer had the final say in personnel decisions this year. The results have been underwhelming. The Panthers were the only team to pay a free-agent running back, and Miles Sanders has not made much of a case for more spending at the position in the future.

Advertisement

Sanders, who signed a four-year, $25.4 million contract, has become an afterthought behind Chuba Hubbard while struggling to get untracked. Tight end Hayden Hurst had not found much of a role before suffering a season-ending concussion at Chicago on Nov. 9, while DJ Chark has failed to emerge as a consistent vertical stretch.

The Panthers on Tuesday released veteran edge rusher Justin Houston, who managed a half-sack in seven games before getting hurt. Reich wanted to bring Houston in for his leadership and productivity, while former running backs coach Duce Staley is said to have backed the signings of Sanders and Chark. But Fitterer had to sign off on all of them.

 

Trading up for Matt Corral

Former Panthers GM Dave Gettleman used to warn against “shopping hungry,” which is what the Panthers did during the 2022 draft while looking to upgrade the QB position (after previously missing out on Matthew Stafford and Deshaun Watson). The Panthers talked to the Cleveland Browns during the draft about trading for Baker Mayfield, while thinking about taking a shot on a mid-round quarterback.

After Malik Willis went to Tennessee in the third round, the Panthers traded up for Matt Corral, the Ole Miss quarterback who had not interviewed well and exhibited “unreliable behavior” in college, according to the NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport. The Panthers took Corral over former UNC quarterback Sam Howell, who has started 14 games for Washington this year, and the Niners’ Brock Purdy, who, in fairness, was not viewed as a mid-round prospect.

Corral sustained a season-ending foot injury during a preseason game as a rookie, and was released during final cuts before this season. Corral signed with New England before leaving the team before Week 1 for a personal matter. He has not resurfaced for as much as a tryout since.

You know I'm not afraid to push back when I don't agree, but this article (and your take) is spot on.

I'll lead the riot on Mint St if Scotty F is still there on Jan. 8th

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Still think the bad needs to include making Sam Darnold THE plan.  Picking up his 5th year for no reason. 

Don’t forget that we gave up a good amount more draft pick value (gave early picks got late picks) to get Darnold and Corral and CMC has had a lower cap hit for SF over 2022-2023 than Darnold and Corral did for us.

I don’t have access to the Athletic but I hope he mentioned how bad our drafting has been the past 3 drafts, especially considering we traded away a zillion picks for almost nothing.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've all been harping about this all year and even longer. We're the worst franchise in the league currently in large part because we've made horrible personnel moves, both in terms of the roster and the coaching ranks. We have some good players and we probably have some good coaches but we don't have enough to overcome the rest of the poo show.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

100% but to me the worst moves (or non moves) was not taking the burns deal and Corral.  The dude is literally out of the league and he had, as person points out, a ton of red flags.

And then he screwed up AGAIN by not trading Burns to the Bears instead of Moore. Not as good a deal as the Rams windfall but an acceptable value IMO... and yet... nah, let's keep him and get rid of the proven receiving threat when bringing in an undersized QB that will be specifically leaned on to enable YAC to make the offense go.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We've all been harping about this all year and even longer. We're the worst franchise in the league currently in large part because we've made horrible personnel moves, both in terms of the roster and the coaching ranks. We have some good players and we probably have some good coaches but we don't have enough to overcome the rest of the poo show.

One of the most damning pieces of evidence was when Fitterer said this roster was better except for maybe a couple spots. It shows how little clue he has in evaluating talent and that has turned us into the least talented team in the NFL who doesn’t have the number 1 pick and probably number 33 in 2025.

Also, the fact that we were the only team to sign a high priced RB FA speaks volumes again on a GM who frankly doesn’t know what he’s doing and is wrong 99% of the time.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We've all been harping about this all year and even longer. We're the worst franchise in the league currently in large part because we've made horrible personnel moves, both in terms of the roster and the coaching ranks. We have some good players and we probably have some good coaches but we don't have enough to overcome the rest of the poo show.

Good & accurate assessment. 

Fitty is the biggest current issue on the team.  There is no logic that could support bringing him back after his cascade of failures, the biggest (and should be unequivocal grounds for termination) was misjudging the roster so incredibly badly to trade up to #1.  And this was just the topping on the cake of bad decisions with draft capital.

That being said, we'll probably never know behind the scenes how much Tepper is pulling the strings.  The fact the Fitty is even still here is a bad sign IMO b/c it seems like Fitty has traded job security for being a yes man to the owner who really wants to run the show.

All we can hope is the Fitty is gone come Jan 8th, and that Tepper hires a legit GM and stays out of the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WhoKnows said:

One of the most damning pieces of evidence was when Fitterer said this roster was better except for maybe a couple spots. It shows how little clue he has in evaluating talent and that has turned us into the least talented team in the NFL who doesn’t have the number 1 pick and probably number 33 in 2025.

Also, the fact that we were the only team to sign a high priced RB FA speaks volumes again on a GM who frankly doesn’t know what he’s doing and is wrong 99% of the time.

In the future he needs to learn to shut the fug up because the more he talks the more he has stuff that can be used against him.  IE. "We dont plan to be picking in the top 10 again"

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

100% but to me the worst moves (or non moves) was not taking the burns deal and Corral.  The dude is literally out of the league and he had, as person points out, a ton of red flags.

for me, the worst part is, this org has had no vision or horrific plans ever since folks like Fitterer arrived.  

everything is that.  Love or hate Teddy, keeping him and drafting a QB made sense.  They messed that up.  Then the Sam Darnold era made zero sense.  Instead of a depth chart project he was THE plan.   Then they have Cam save us from our nightmare move that frankly made zero sense outside of getting fans off their back so they/we could have that farewell with him...and then they didn't even give us that.  Then the pointless Baker era.  Then the dysfunctional trade the farm for Bryce Young and give him no weapons or weapons that don't fit what he would be doing because somehow, because he doesn't need them. 

Scott Fitterer IMO wasn't qualified to come into a weak front office and build a team because he was a weak candidate to begin with.  Came in here and IMO has thought he could somehow create some discount version of the Seattle LOB team.  I think Horn was Fitterer.  That's always what made sense.  Think Bryce was Fitterer.  Think the mindset you can have a discount O with a small QB and heavily invest in your D is Fitterer.     But it was a whack vision.  Seattled pimped Russell and the LOB.  What made it actually work IMO was the ground and pound of Lynch.  Dominant run game paired w/ a fluke D (in terms of how it all came together and how good it was.  You can't build that intentionally). 

 

  • Pie 6
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The product on the field has been bad and Im sure that has an impact.   That said I have to wonder if the in-person experience isnt losing its luster when pitted against 70"+ screens with DVRs and access to all the games, convenient and clean bathrooms, and comparatively cheap food and beer.
    • Has it ever occurred to you why blood sugar swings are a thing? If so, there are many factors to consider. The obvious ones are dietary, specifically the consumption of carbohydrates and sugar. Surprisingly, dehydration plays a role, as do medication intake, hormonal changes, and stress. That’s right, even emotional and physical triggers release certain hormones that outweigh the insulin hormone. Whatever the cause, when persistent, people risk experiencing symptoms such as dizziness, low energy, blurred vision, and feelings of weakness. One team claims to have developed a formula that stabilizes blood sugar levels while improving metabolic health for those riddled with swings between the highs and lows. In turn, this supplement’s dual-purpose nature can potentially unlock health benefits in different areas. Eager to find out more? Here is a summary of our findings on  What is Liponine™? Liponine™ is an all-natural dietary supplement in tincture format formulated to assist in regulating weight and blood sugar levels. The core of this formula was designed with the implications of an aging pancreas in mind, as well as the continued effects of inflammation and oxidative stress on overall health. Our editorial team was drawn to Liponine™ for two main reasons. First, it leverages three clinically studied blood sugar and weight management ingredients. Second, their strategy doesn’t come across as a temporary fix but as one that might make relevant corrections on a cellular level. To help put these elements together, our editorial team decided we needed to delve deeper into the creators, GDRLabs™ approach. How does Liponine™ work? Liponine™ is a dietary tincture developed to counteract the effects of an aging pancreas. The GDRLabs™ team explained how, in healthy people, carbohydrates are broken down into glucose, which is used as fuel by different bodily components. Cells, tissues, and organs rely on the insulin hormone’s help to absorb and use glucose. The pancreas releases this hormone and regulates and processes sugar floating around in the bloodstream. According to the creators, an aging pancreas cannot produce enough insulin, which causes blood sugar levels to fluctuate. In other words, low insulin levels indicate an excess of sugar in the bloodstream. These bodily components waiting for their fuel supply begin to suffer, namely experiencing weakness, dizziness, or sweatiness, to name a few of the minor side effects. When this condition is left unattended, individuals are putting themselves at risk of obesity, poor heart health and blood circulation, and, worse, amputation or death. If things aren’t bad enough for people with an aging pancreas, sugar addiction is like adding fuel to the burning fire. While it might not exactly be possible to reverse the aging nature of the pancreas, it is possible to tame fluctuations in blood sugar. As per GDRLabs™, Liponine™ comprises key nutrients that have a significant blood-lowering effect and several other secondary outcomes that elevate one’s overall wellness. Now’s probably a good time to dive into the foundation of Liponine™. What ingredients are in Liponine™? Liponine™ contains no more than three main ingredients combined in a 926 mg proprietary blend: Berberine Berberine is a plant-based chemical known for its bitter taste and medicinal properties. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that covered the effects of berberine on blood sugar levels in type 2 diabetic patients reported that the chemical could significantly reduce fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin. The former shows glucose levels after around 8 hours of fasting, whereas the latter measures the average blood sugar level over the past three months. The researchers also highlighted that berberine might be safe, as it neither increases the risk of side effects nor hypoglycemia. Another source that explained the different pathways by which berberine might improve blood sugar levels emphasized its ability to increase insulin sensitivity, promote insulin production and the breakdown of glucose, regulate metabolism, widen arteries (as a result of increased nitric oxide production), and slow the rate at which carbohydrates are absorbed in the gut. These results appear to stem from a dose ranging between 600 and 1,500 mg daily. Curcumin Curcumin is a bioactive compound derived from turmeric, a flowering plant belonging to the Zingiberaceae family. This ingredient is best known for its anti-inflammatory properties, which might be handy in regulating blood sugar levels. Our editorial team stumbled upon a recent systematic review that assessed whether curcumin affects blood sugar levels. Ultimately, the researchers concluded that its anti-diabetic activity is attributed to its ability to suppress oxidative stress and inflammatory processes. Furthermore, it was mentioned that curcumin significantly reduces fasting blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin, and body mass index. Circling back on the notion of “oxidative stress”, this occurs when there is an imbalance between free radicals and antioxidants in the body. When the former overtakes the latter, several chain chemical reactions occur in the body called oxidation, which mostly has harmful impacts. Normally, the role of the antioxidant is to donate an electron to the unstable free radical to neutralize it; however, with an imbalance favoring the bad, the result is excess oxidation. What does this mean for blood sugar levels? An oxidative environment might increase insulin resistance, impair beta cells (linked to insulin performance) and glucose tolerance, and deteriorate mitochondrial function, all of which contribute to creating a diabetic state. Green Tea Extract Green tea extract is a concentrated form of green tea made from the Camella sinensis plant. As one source underlines, a single serving of the extract (which is small) is said to contain the same amount of active ingredients as an average cup of green tea. Its health benefits stem from its rich source of antioxidants, namely catechins like epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). This ingredient naturally helps increase the body’s antioxidant capacity, which, as discussed earlier, is essential for neutralizing the effects of free radicals. As a result of this property, individuals can anticipate several benefits. Particularly, research has demonstrated epigallocatechin gallate’s ability to decrease inflammation, blood pressure, and blood fat levels, improve brain function (by protecting brain cells from oxidative stress), induce weight loss results (by regulating hormones that increase thermogenesis), promote healthy liver function, and lead to overall improvements in the skin. Regarding blood sugar, the same source found studies that confirmed EGCG’s role in increasing insulin sensitivity and regulating blood sugar production, thereby lowering blood sugar levels. Again, this might be a dose-dependent outcome requiring 1,500 mg. Other ingredients that support the main ingredients include black pepper extract and D-limonene. The former has been included to increase the body’s ability to absorb curcumin, whereas the latter further heightens the formula’s anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. For those who are curious about the chemistry or how specific concentrations and solvents are used, here is a quick summary: Berberine HCL – 3L (30 kg: 43.5 L) in 10% Ethanol Turmeric Root Extract (95% Curcuminoids) – 5.5L (25 kg: 47.5L) in 10% Ethanol Green Tea 50% Caffeine Extract Powder – 0.5L (1 kg: 3L) in 10% Ethanol Black Pepper Extract Powder – 18L (1 kg: 18L) in 100% Ethanol Take the example of Berberine. The above breakdown suggests that 30 liters (in volume) of berberine were used to prepare the batch. The ratio in the brackets likely indicates that 30 liters return 43.5 liters of solution. Finally, ethanol appears to be the solvent used to dissolve the ingredient. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Q. What makes Liponine™ superior to other blood sugar formulas? A. Liponine™ is superior to other blood sugar formulas for several reasons. At the top of the list is their patented DualPolar™ extraction process. Specifically, the berberine found in this formula was mixed into a precise blend of extract solvents – acting like magnets – that separate active compounds from their plant matters. The result is a full-spectrum extraction of all 64 indole alkaloids normally found within berberine, ensuring that people are getting 100% for what they are paying. The GDRLabs™ team added liquid piperine to this mix, which increases berberine’s bioavailability by 3,000%. Other features that give this tincture a competitive edge include manufacturing processes in America (under strict and sterile conditions), third-party lab testing (for maximum potency and safety), and being plant-based and cruelty-free. Q. Is Liponine™ safe? A. Based on the list of ingredients and their associated concentrations per serving, Liponine™ appears to be a safe tincture to take. As with any dietary supplement (regardless of format), it is imperative to dig further into matters and/or have a full-on discussion with a healthcare provider before getting started. This is especially important for those who are pregnant, nursing, or taking prescription medications. Q. Are there other ingredients in Liponine™ that I should be aware of? A. Yes, other ingredients likely added to create the tincture’s base and flavor profile include olive oil, ethyl alcohol, and strawberry flavoring. Q. How do I take Liponine™? A. The recommended serving size is 1 ml (or a single dropper) of Liponine™. To get started, individuals are asked to shake the bottle well. Then, it is a matter of taking one serving orally and waiting 30 seconds before swallowing it. This process should be repeated every day. Q. What types of results can I expect from Liponine™? A. Liponine™ is believed to induce weight loss results, increase digestion, and promote healthy glucose levels. Q. How long will it take to see a difference with Liponine™? A. According to the GDRLabs™ team, Liponine™ has been subjected to several test groups. Participants have generally reported some change within the first day (normally in terms of energy); however, to experience a noticeable change, this supplement must be taken for at least 30 days. Consistency is key, as the compounding effect over time will reward users. Q. Does Liponine™ have any side effects? A. No side effects have allegedly been reported during their years of clinical testing, but as always, each person is unique and should, therefore, look further into the formula beforehand. Q. What is the difference between Liponine™ regular and clinical strengths? A. The difference rests in the potency. Liponine™ Clinical Strength offers double the dose of its key ingredients for maximum impact. This might be suitable for people with significant health challenges related to blood sugar and metabolic function. Q. What is the estimated arrival time for Liponine™ shipments? A. Orders typically take 24 to 72 hours to process before shipping them out. From there, most contiguous American states’ estimated arrival time ranges between 5 and 7 business days. For international shipments, customers are responsible for applicable taxes and customs charges, with the arrival time ranging between 2 and 5 weeks. The higher the price paid for shipping, the sooner the packages will arrive. Q. Does a money-back guarantee protect Liponine™purchases? A. Yes, Liponine™ has been protected by a 90-day money-back guarantee. If individuals have little to say about the improvements within the first 90 days of taking this supplement, customer support can be reached for a full purchase price refund. Unused bottles are guaranteed a complete refund, whereas certain used bottles might be eligible for a partial refund. This is a discussion to have with the customer support team, possibly in one of the following ways: Phone number: (629) 276-4922 Mailing address: 1360 Union Hill Road, Alpharetta, GA 30004   How much does Liponine™ cost? Each Liponine™ (regular-strength) bottle contains 50 drops, enough to last a month. With that, the current going price is $29, which has been reduced from the original price of $63. GDRLabs™: Setting the Standards High for Innovation & Superiority GameDay Ready™ (GDRLabs™, for short) is a health and wellness supplement provider with a reputable status in American manufacturing. They had heads turning for their renowned Conolidine formula, developed to provide targeted muscle and joint therapy. Five areas helped this team introduce innovative solutions while setting high standards for others. First and foremost, GDRLabs™ takes pride in its 100% American manufacturing processes. This means that it’s sidestepped outsourcing to maintain standards and avoid compromises. Second, it has introduced an approach that guarantees potency, quality, and freshness with each bottle. Third, GDRLabs™ is deemed an embodiment of superiority, as its solutions result from research, exclusive craftsmanship, and consistency. Next, they’ve employed what’s called PureDemand™, an on-demand manufacturing process originally designed for elite athletes. The latter contributes to the second and third facets mentioned previously. Finally, and coinciding with the first, are their ongoing efforts to guarantee increased potency. If there’s anything to take away from everything, the team feels it’s probably this: “Liponine™ is formulated with naturally occurring compounds, ensuring a safe alternative to synthetic medications. This natural composition minimizes the risk of side effects, making it a suitable option for long-term use in managing blood sugar levels and supporting metabolic health.” Final Verdict From the discussion above, it should be clear that Liponine™ was formulated with metabolic health and blood sugar in mind. The GDRLabs™ team tapped into the health benefits and clinical evidence of berberine, green tea, and curcumin, which is clever on their part. Not only were they able to arrive at a simple solution, but they also found ways to ensure that each serving was complete (with nothing going to waste due to low bioavailability). Our research on the ingredients aligns with many of the statements made by the GDRLabs™ team, which is likely to reassure many individuals.  
    • My buddy and I sold ours for the cost of the transfer fee. He listed them on Marketplace and found someone interested. He wanted them for his kids. I told my buddy to report him for child abuse.
×
×
  • Create New...