Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the Panthers Should NOT want Ben Johnson


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

in house culture, work environment, accountability is a real thing though that matters.  I think ours is weak and has a lot to do with our hires at HC and GM.  

lot of good X and O guys have proven to be weak in that area.  I think you got to have both from top. 

It doesn't all have to come from the HC though. Look at the Dolphins. Young, hit shot wiz kid, almost childlike acting HC but the GM is a lifer who has been around forever. Same with the DC. You do need a blend within the organization but no one person can wear all the hats.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It doesn't all have to come from the HC though. Look at the Dolphins. Young, hit shot wiz kid, almost childlike acting HC but the GM is a lifer who has been around forever. Same with the DC. You do need a blend within the organization but no one person can wear all the hats.

I don't disagree, that's why I included the GM hire with the HC.   Every org needs that in house stuff.  It matters.  It's a huge weakness for us.  It's got to come from somewhere in the future for us.   Just hiring a some young hot shot HC isn't some auto fix the mess Tepper has created in Carolina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I don't disagree, that's why I included the GM hire with the HC.   Every org needs that in house stuff.  It matters.  It's a huge weakness for us.  It's got to come from somewhere in the future for us.   Just hiring a some young hot shot HC isn't some auto fix the mess Tepper has created in Carolina. 

Everything football related is a huge weakness for the football organization that Tepper has built. It's just been a revolving door of guys who Tepper had deemed the one who is going to wave a magic wand and fix everything.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to be upset if we don't get Johnson. Honestly, there is so much hype around him it makes me nervous that he will end up being a bust. 

The main reason I don't mind if we don't get Johnson is we really need a culture-setter type. We can't seem to do anything right, have zero discipline, get pushed around, hell we only have like 2 guys who has actually seen a winning season in a Panthers' uniform. Need a culture reset big time. 

That's why I don't really care if we get a Belichick, Harbaugh, or Quinn for 2-3 years. Build a culture and learn to do the basic things right and then go get the next Ben Johnson, because there will be one. 

I think Campbell is that guy in Detroit, I don't think he is going to take them far in the postseason. He is that bridge that is going to connect the old Lions to this more refined Lions team that will attract a candidate that will take them there in a year or two. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

"Leader of men" is the coaching equivalent of "alpha" for players. Just a tired old stereotypical trope that doesn't really mean anything beyond "this person checks the stereotype box if I was casting this role for a movie".

The last leader of men we were offered wanted an OC whose currently being accused of running a high school level offense and a DC who'd pretty well proven he wasn't up to the task.

It's the same as choosing political leaders because they give great speeches rather than whether or not they actually have a clue what they're doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need a coach who gives you an advantage.  Period.  Has nothing to do with the old "leader of men" trope.  What kind of culture did the Dolphins have before McDaniel?  The Lions before the current staff?  Bengals?

All the teams that turned things around got two things right:  Coach and QB.  That's it.  You get those two things right and your franchise can flip immediately.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BrianS said:

You need a coach who gives you an advantage.  Period.  Has nothing to do with the old "leader of men" trope.  What kind of culture did the Dolphins have before McDaniel?  The Lions before the current staff?  Bengals?

All the teams that turned things around got two things right:  Coach and QB.  That's it.  You get those two things right and your franchise can flip immediately.

largely.  I'd argue QB still matters more than your HC.  It's the most important puzzle piece. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

I'll go on record saying I don't find Ben Johnson to be compelling at all.  I want Bill with McDaniels as OC.  

No offense to you, but what has either done without Brady… ?

they had their moment together, the moment is over…bill needs to be on his boat somewhere 

if you want someone from  the patriots,  it’s probably Mayo.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's being generous.

His entire 7 minute rant is based on the 15 million a year rumor and it's full of completely idiotic takes.

The video is garbage.

The take that he should take less just to show he really wants the job is hilarious and delusional. There is no single argument against Ben in there outside him asking for a market based salary. Garbage sums it up well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Martin said:

The take that he should take less just to show he really wants the job is hilarious and delusional. There is no single argument against Ben in there outside him asking for a market based salary. Garbage sums it up well.

Also, idk why we care how much coaches get paid to begin with. It affects nobody but Tepper and his steep pockets. He could give Ben 20 million dollars and I would not care as long as he does his job well. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Martin said:

The take that he should take less just to show he really wants the job is hilarious and delusional. There is no single argument against Ben in there outside him asking for a market based salary. Garbage sums it up well.

Yeah, we need to wait for a guy who wants the job so bad that he'll take less money just for the privilege.

 

...

 

Good luck with that 😕

(also while we're at it, let's try taking that same approach with players)

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I've seen the results of Tepper hiring "leaders of men". Rhule was a "leader of men". Reich was a "leader of men". Wilks was the best of his "leaders of men".

I feel like when you have to hang your hat on a guy being a "leader of men" to justify your hire it's because you're fresh out of football justifications. Watch clips of Mike McDaniel. Does that guy strike you as a "leader of men"? He seems like an 19 year old TikToker. But it doesn't matter because the guy knows fuging football and that's what actually gets the respect of NFL players over the long haul. "Leaders of men" might pull the wool over their eyes in the short term but ultimately these guys want successful careers with wins, legacies, and fat ass bank accounts and "leaders of men" can only do so much. Football savants can do a lot more. I don't know that that's what Ben Johnson is but I definitely know that I don't give a fug whether or not he's a "leader of men".

I somewhat agree. I also feel that guys like Demeco, Tomlin, Dan campbell, Sirianni all possess a certain hard nosed quality that shapes the football culture. I do believe that teams take on the personality of their coach to a point.

Yes Mike McDonald is an offensive savant. His team also tucks their nuts when they get hit in the mouth. The 9ers always play Shanahan football, even when McDonald was on staff. Leaders of men is an overused cliche. BEING a hard nosed leader is not. 

 Knowing football aint enough. Reich knows football too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...