Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pick 33


MGH1989
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

No, no, no.

No more fuging trading down. All that does is load up our roster with guys that will be off it in 2 seasons.

Get a GM that isn’t an idiot and draft BPA. Don’t fuging overthink it.

Assuming we have the right GM, I want a trade down. Let Penix or McCarthy drop out if the first and have another team overpay for them. Again this is assuming the GM is good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Assuming we have the right GM, I want a trade down. Let Penix or McCarthy drop out if the first and have another team overpay for them. Again this is assuming the GM is good. 

Like I said, no, no, no.

All that trading down in an attempt to get more picks almost always fails miserably.

There is are two accepable scenarios to trade down:

1. Crazy haul(see what the Bears got from us)

2. You don’t really love many of the remaining guys on the board.

Outside that it is almost ALWAYS a mistake to trade down.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I’m with you, but I just don’t think it’s happening.  They’re going to double down on Bryce next year.  I would be shocked if Tepper is ready to move on.

Don't get me wrong, that would be the smart play meaning there's not a chance in hell we do it.  Tepper is a hedge fund manager, he ought to know that's the thing to do, but his ego won't let him show any crack in solidarity with Bryce.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
    • Very interesting indeed. It did make my head swim more. It said a lot, but it still didn't give any concrete answers. Kinda makes me want to pivot back towards a premium position though...
×
×
  • Create New...