Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pick 33


MGH1989
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

You can play that game all day. Plenty of talented players went AFTER their pick as well. How about Tank Dell? 

That is the point though, why trade down? Thats a Scott Fitterer special. THE MORE THE MERRIER!!!

Also happens to be a complete disaster of a draft.

Hard pass. Be good at evaluation, take BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That is the point though, why trade down? Thats a Scott Fitterer special. THE MORE THE MERRIER!!!

Also happens to be a complete disaster of a draft.

Hard pass. Be good at evaluation, take BPA.

Good at evaluating is the key. You can miss on 33 just as easy as 42. If we get someone who can evaluate well trading down makes sense with all the holes we have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Good at evaluating is the key. You can miss on 33 just as easy as 42. If we get someone who can evaluate well trading down makes sense with all the holes we have. 

Yeah, I just disagree. We have our pick of the 33rd guy overall and a complete extra day to break it down. Just take the best guy.

No reason to get cute. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MGH1989 said:

LT

LG

RG

C

WR

Trade up

 

choose your fighter 

This is a multi year rebuild; can’t fix it all in one year.  Addressing the OP’s immediate question…

1.  WR that can get separation.  No slots, please.

2.  LT

3.  C/G

Assumptions:  BC gets first shot at LT next year.  Ickey is moved inside and competes against Zavala, Mays, others for a starting spot at LG.  C/G pick backs up Bozeman and Corbett.  LT pick backs up BC and Moton.  

Go run heavy.  Re-sign Foreman, admitting our mistake in letting him walk. 

Bryce gets one more year to demonstrate that he is or is not capable of being an NFL starter.  If Bryce disappoints in 2024, we draft higher in 2025 and pick Bryce’s replacement.

2024 is going to be butt ugly, no matter what we do.  Might as well sort out our WR and O line issues in 2024, setting up Bryce or his 2025 replacement for more success.

 

Edited by bythenbrs
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Panthers will have to build via free agency due to trading away so many valuable draft picks. There are so many holes it is impossible to fill them with the draft. The key is getting the right GM and HC…..and making sure they are strong enough to tell Tepper to back off. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...