Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently our players really like Chris Tabor and Thomas Brown


ProcessBlue2
 Share

Recommended Posts

Dollar bet with someone:

Tepper will repeat the same mistake from last year. another coaching overhaul firing popular coaches who haven’t been given a fair shot, install yet another confusing scheme, and have another god awful record. 

When he could have just left this in place, build continuity, see what we really have with coaches that know the players, and go from there. This constant rush to get the awesomest coaching staff hasn’t really worked out so well. 

After the latest show, does he really believe he’s going to hire better then we currently have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Wow. That is concerning. A culture of losing and stealing paychecks is accepted here. It’s worse than a thought. 

No kidding. How is this good news? The players like the OC on a team who has scored the lowest amount of offensive points in the NFL? We have scored 3 more points than NE, but we have 1 more D/Return TD than they do.

IDGAF who our offense likes. Our offense is fuging trash. I care more about DJ Moore loving his QB and CMC enjoying the hell out of SF. Doesn’t appear to be any regret with them. DJ has 9 TDs, CMC has 21 TDs and our entire offense has 20 TDs.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

Really strange that Ben Johnson isn't included in this list when he's probably the hottest name on the HC market, wonder why that is

Because this list has nothing to do with how good a coordinator you are just how well liked you are. We have the worst offense in the league but our OC is  well liked. Well liked doesn’t put any extra point on the scoreboard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Wow. That is concerning. A culture of losing and stealing paychecks is accepted here. It’s worse than a thought. 

Because we haven’t had a winning season in 7 years. Most of these guys are used to getting coached by losers and making great money in the process. They care more about be cool and funny on the team social media rather than being held accountable.
 

Rhule’s culture was garbage and Frank’s was worse. Go look at Jeff Saturdays interview describing the shitty culture he cleaned up in Indy.
 

If the Panthers hire a legit HC that cares about winning and actually knows how, a lot of these guys are going to buck the system. God forbid they get a hard ass like Belichick some of them might quit.

Edited by ProcessBlue2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a tough time figuring how a 1st time OC for the most nothing offense in the league gets any love at all. They produce very little. Piniero is about the only thing to fear. Yet there he is in the polls. Strange and mixed up times.

Brown could be good or okay, maybe. He is gonna go as far as his QB goes. I will credit him for being a running back and therefore innately possessing a belief in having a strong running game. So, some hope. 

I have at least seen some under center. And they seem to know that the end zone is the goal, and they have clear premeditated intent to at least try to throw N>S in that general direction. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Because we haven’t had a winning season in 7 years. Most of these guys are used to getting coached by losers and making great money in the process. They care more about be cool and funny on the team social media rather than being held accountable.
 

Rhule’s culture was garbage and Frank’s was worse. Go look at Jeff Saturdays interview describing the shitty culture he cleaned up in Indy.
 

If the Panthers hire a legit HC that cares about winning and actually knows how, a lot of these guys are going to buck the system. God forbid they get a hard ass like Belichick some of them might quit.

Bingo. Same thing I just posted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...