Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Coach/GM Updates


ProcessBlue2
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You claim I'm misquoting something, only to turn around and completely mischaracterize what I've said 🤔

Can you actually quote where I've said analytics shouldn't be used at all?

Hint: I haven't.

What I did say was in response to the suggestion that if we'd engaged in analytics we might not have messed up on Young and others, etc. 

Hence, why I pointed out to our sadly mistaken friend that we did.

Of course we looked at analytics, but we also looked at traditional scouting. Which was the primary driver? 
You keep making absolute statements trying to prove your point and it’s not going well. 
Just because we looked at some analytics driven data doesn’t mean if we had used more that the outcome wouldn’t have been different. 
if anything I would say traditional scouting hurt us more than anything, better use of analytics could have prevented that.  Also better scouting could have. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Of course we looked at analytics, but we also looked at traditional scouting. Which was the primary driver? 
You keep making absolute statements trying to prove your point and it’s not going well. 
Just because we looked at some analytics driven data doesn’t mean if we had used more that the outcome wouldn’t have been different. 
if anything I would say traditional scouting hurt us more than anything, better use of analytics could have prevented that.  Also better scouting could have. 

I'm sure you would say that, but you don't have a single thing to back that up.

Your entire position is basically to disagree with me (which near as I can tell is the only reason you post at all). The problem is you don't seem to have read a single piece of info on the things you claim to know.

Talk to me when you've actually got something to support your claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm sure you would say that, but you don't have a single thing to back that up.

Your entire position is basically to disagree with me (which near as I can tell is the only reason you post at all). The problem is you don't seem to have read a single piece of info on the things you claim to know.

Talk to me when you've actually got something to support your claims.

diverting again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
    • I don't know. CMC is like others and may have lip serviced that line of " I had no plan or wanted to leave Carolina" I think he even said he bought a house too and wanted this to be home.   Here's what I heard- In a way Panthers org gave him a test and he didn't "fight" back. They approached CMC and told him they wanted to put him on IR since the "season" was over or out of playoff reach. CMC didn't fight it one lick and agreed. They secretly wanted him to kept playing or want to, but there was no kickback. I honestly don't know if its real or not, 5th hand information type deal doing on. Yes he had bruises and pains, but was able to play...... but went along with Panthers staff. Odd to be playing games with star players, but whatever....   Plus the staff doctors found out about his tendinitis and there was nothing to fix it. Even with him missing time, it was the best move to trade him before he got inflamed constantly.    Lastly, its mostly time a combo of stuff, Fitterererere did not sign him to be the highest paid RB. That was classic Marty "give me a" herniay doing. GMs have different values on roster spots and rumor was Fitterererer was one that didn't want to pay RBs. For all his faults, he's right about that......
×
×
  • Create New...