Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With Panthers cleaning house how safe is Bryce


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

You know what else doesn't happen? The Panthers getting an elite Oline and a good WR corps. You're going to be defending Young daily until he's off the team. At least you're dedicated.

I’ll settle for avg. 

If we can get avg. That is a starting point in seeing what we have in BY.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Being purposable obtuse is a strange look for him.  But he always seems to pop up to defend bryce

I think it's a schtick but it might be mental illness so I am just leaving that alone. I get wanting Young to succeed but going to his draft or school history to prop him up with his NFL film is just laughable. It feels like punching down so I'm out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

After his play this year they have to bring in competition. It doesn't have to be a pick or a trade or an expensive FA, all sound like terrible choices to me at this point. Just someone that can play at NFL backup level. If Young can't beat that out then he shouldn't be starting. What was spent on him is gone along with 2 key people that brought him in so that doesn't matter. Either they can get better play out of him in 24 or he is toast. They already forced him to play most of a season with little improvement so playing time isn't the issue.

Fix the team for sure either way. The lines, WRs and TEs need to happen regardless. As for Bryce if he can't do better in training camp he shouldn't be starting going forward. Sign a backup QB and let them compete.

No you don’t. If he’s going to fail I’d rather him fail epically so ideally we’re back at the top of the draft next year and can draft whoever the best QB is in that draft. I don’t see how bringing in a Garoppolo type to take us from a 3 win team to a 5 win team solves anything besides hurting draft positioning 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, recceice said:

Agreed.. The biggest Hope right now Is BY improving..

It's the best case scenario for both Bryce and the Panthers. Everything else has gone wrong, and I do mean everything. You couldn't have predicted a complete worse case scenario than what happened to this team this season.  Everything that could go wrong did go wrong.  That just doesn't happen without complete incompetent management. 

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

So you admit Young played below average but you still think he isn't a problem.  Interesting logic

I’m sorry I’ll clarify.. I will settle for Avg. Oline play, weapons and coaching.. So we can get a true look into what BY can be.. I don’t know what you didn’t get from my original post..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It's the best case scenario for both Bryce and the Panthers. Everything else has gone wrong, and I do mean everything. You couldn't have predicted a complete worse case scenario than what happened to this team this season.  Everything that could go wrong did go wrong.  That just doesn't happen without complete incompetent management. 

Totally agree..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans have buyers remorse because he looked bad and this was one of the worst seasons by a team in the 21st century.  That I get.  Fact is, the next coach & GM has Bryce on the roster. He's here for 2024.  

Combined with this past season's film, the new staff will have an entire offseason, preseason, and probably 8-10 games before they know what they have with Bryce.  That's what we're working with here.  We'll find out a lot of things this next season and where the future lies. 

It's absolutely unrealistic to expect us to trade for Fields.  It's also unrealistic to expect a QB at 33 or even maybe 65.  Have we not learned about forcing QBs without building a team?  We're not immediately getting rid or somehow trading Bryce, and we're not drafting a QB high.  It's just not happening.

HOWEVER, don't forget the new GM will be coming from another team's scouting dept., with their own perspective on Bryce through another lens.   Therefore, it's also unrealistic to expect us to force a new regime to trot out Bryce without getting a sound QB room that suits their standards around him.  He regressed throughout the season sans 1 half game performance against GB.  

It should not deter them from bringing Dalton back or signing a new vet.  It should also not deter them from taking a mid-round chance on a Cameron Ward type as backup who could get thrust into games.  A scenario like that is what we're dealing with if any.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, recceice said:

Which he will be doing again next year..

We don't know that.  Because don't know who our HC is.  What our scheme will be.  We don't know what our offense will be.   

Bryce Young 100% will need a good QB room.   It's a given he inherits Young.  It's not a given he will want the rest of the room to be the same.  And a new HC likely will want insurance.  And he has a brand new offense to install.   

Bryce Young can get worse.  Sophomore years are often tough on QBs.  Because the league has a full offseason to study your tape and all your issues.  A worse Bryce Young is going to prevent a functioning O from getting jump started here. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FuFuLamePoo said:

No you don’t. If he’s going to fail I’d rather him fail epically so ideally we’re back at the top of the draft next year and can draft whoever the best QB is in that draft. I don’t see how bringing in a Garoppolo type to take us from a 3 win team to a 5 win team solves anything besides hurting draft positioning 

I think you could have done that with Fritters and Reich still here but not a new crew. That will not end up with good hires in that scenario. I was thinking of another Dalton or prove it guy type backup, nothing expensive like Jimmy G has been(then again Jimmy G in 23 is about right play wise). I don't think you can do that to a new staff and think you end up with anyone good that will be tied to having to play Young another 16 or 17 games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

We don't know that.  Because don't know who our HC is.  What our scheme will be.  We don't know what our offense will be.   

Bryce Young 100% will need a good QB room.   It's a given he inherits Young.  It's not a given he will want the rest of the room to be the same.  And a new HC likely will want insurance.  And he has a brand new offense to install.   

Bryce Young can get worse.  Sophomore years are often tough on QBs.  Because the league has a full offseason to study your tape and all your issues.  A worse Bryce Young is going to prevent a functioning O from getting jump started here. 

We do know the owner right?? 
The person doing the hiring right??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok--I have seen some sample items, and I would like to see something (if possible) measures on field intelligence--maybe how quickly you can grasp a playbook or absorb film session adjustments...Back when we had Morrison as team president and Hurney as GM, I offered to assess (as part of my research in education requirement at a University) emotional intelligence and learning styles of players to help coaches teach more effectively.  Morrison loved it and contacted me about it.  Hurney was not interested, and it fell through the cracks.  My pitch?  If only 50% of first-rounders become successful NFL players and that number drops significantly, can you tell me that you are effectively measuring talent?  Morrison thought it was a good point and wanted to do something that might improve long-term success rates--that would impact the cap management, etc.  Marty, according to Morrison, said he was not interested at this time and if so, he would want a football guy to do it.  (I told Morrison that I played in college and Hurney, a sports reporter at one time, did not. He told me that Hurney played as a Guard in college--who knew?) Any way, about that time, Morrison left (2017) and the idea was dropped.  I reached back out a year later or so to Marty was still not interested.  A few days later, his wife accused him of assault or something, so I dropped it.
    • Pretty sure they still do the Wonderlic they just don't publicly release the scores.
    • I just thought he was under the radar--but thanks for opening our eyes to him.  I think we should have better measures for intelligence--such as reaction time, angles, etc. Legette is raw as heck, for example, and his RAS was very high.  We used to do the Wonderlic (which was not great) but to know how effectively a player makes on field decisions would be great.  
×
×
  • Create New...