Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs Divisional Round - Games Thread


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Roger. As long as you acknowledge that when a team is getting their ish pushed in every play, then a QB can't will a win. Unless you have Lamar or Cam running ability. The only QBs that could have had any success in this offense.

Nobody here that is critical of BY is under any illusions that this team does not have a great many needs beginning with OL and WR first and foremost. But the reality is even when opportunities presented themselves our QB often lacked the phsyical ability to capitalize. That's not hate or just being negative to recognize. It's simply acknowledging what we've seen.

As far as CJ I have to say the argument here that you are presenting is classic moving the goal posts. For weeks and weeks now we've heard just how good CJ Stroud's supporting cast and coaching staff is. So if you are saying all of that is subpar or mediocre then you are saying the addition of CJ Stroud is the central contributing element that got them into the position to compete in the playoff game they were in tonight.

Just take a breather and admit you have blinders on to a degree too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Navy_football said:

And there it is. If texans win tonight you would have definitely been comparing Bryce and CJ. Crapping on Bryce. Slurping on CJ.

LOL!

Keep coping, man.

We suck. Bryce sucks. Tepper is the architect of it all. The point of this thread is to discuss actual relevant football happening tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Nobody here that is critical of BY is under any illusions that this team does not have a great many needs beginning with OL and WR first and foremost. But the reality is even when opportunities presented themselves our QB often lacked the phsyical ability to capitalize. That's not hate or just being negative to recognize. It's simply acknowledging what we've seen.

As far as CJ I have to say the argument here that you are presenting is classic moving the goal posts. For weeks and weeks now we've heard just how good CJ Stroud's supporting cast and coaching staff is. So if you are saying all of that is subpar or mediocre then you are saying the addition of CJ Stroud is the central contributing element that got them into the position to compete in the playoff game they were in tonight.

Just take a breather and admit you have blinders on to a degree too.

Nope. That's what you're saying. CJ has a better team than Bryce. From coaching to players. He is a major contributing factor but it ain't just him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...