Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Diggs a possibility?


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Then trade for someone else.

Not many elite WRs become available.

 

If Diggs is available we should pursue it. I don't know about you but I'm tired of watching this pathetic offense.

 

Btw I think Diggs just want his targets. If we feed him the ball he will be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His average salary for his talent is a steal, but unless he demands a trade I don’t see why you’d trade him unless you got a haul of picks. With our lack of ammo I just can’t see how another team can’t offer a better package than us.  Only realm of possibility is to get a first in a tag and trade for Burns and use that in the deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Not many elite WRs become available.

 

If Diggs is available we should pursue it. I don't know about you but I'm tired of watching this pathetic offense.

 

Btw I think Diggs just want his targets. If we feed him the ball he will be happy.

I just don't think Bryce is it and adding bad attitude WRs on the wrong side of 30 isn't gonna help us for the future.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I don't think Bryce is it either, but at least we gave him something to work with. If he fails next year it's on him.

At the expense of parting with valuable assets. I don't want to bet anymore valuable assets on Bryce Young. If the guy isn't potentially a part of the plan for the 2025 top 5 pick, I don't want him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd do what I can to sign Michael Pittman.  I think he's the optimal target this FA.

Not Higgins.  Not Gabe Davis.  Not a 28 y/o+ trade target to waste more capital on.

He's got the age, speed, size, downfield ability, and most importantly, is proven at this point.

Ideal WR Route:

Pittman & draft picks this year that don't have a curve to hit w/route running & gaining separation (Adonai Mitchell, McMillan, Corley, etc.)

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

As a FA sure, but we can’t afford to give up anymore valuable picks for players. It would probably cost a future 1st to get him. Losing the top pick in this draft is bad enough, doing it again would be insanity. 

We still have a big deficit in draft picks this year and next. The last thing we need is to give away more 1sts/2nds to prove that Young isn’t the guy. If Young isn’t it, we are wasting the chance at getting better in the draft.

We have to build through the draft, period. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It may not be exact science and this FO is relatively new, but it is very much likely the first couple picks will be of players we met.
    • The only other position group I could think of is ILB since Dan was there for Rodriguez and Hill Jr. pro days in Texas. It’s one of the reasons I get the feeling ILB could be the pick at 19.
    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
×
×
  • Create New...