Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maybe Moore NOT starter (per Gantt, per sources)


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Well, if that ain't mixed signals! But, it's probably for the best. LINK

Two league sources said the Panthers have put out word they're looking for someone to compete with Matt Moore for the starting job. That's a slight departure from what they said Friday when they announced the release of Jake Delhomme, but given that Moore's started seven NFL games, it makes sense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Competition is a good thing.

It will push Moore to performe at his best

Fan's forget Panthers are a RUN first team...

All Moore has to do is come in hand ,protect the ball ,and throw a more accurate pass than Delhomme did to STEVE>

Steve made alot of Jakes high sailers and Floaters look good .

Moore has already shown he can do all the above

Manning,Brady type QB's are not coming to Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing to read here. Of course they want someone who can compete to start.

You have a young and relatively unproven guy. To pick up someone who was not starter quality would be a huge mistake.

Gannt is trying to find filler for his reporting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people keep talking about drafting a QB as a solution to our QB depth situation?

Right now, our QB stable has a cumulative total of 7 NFL games and some change. How will drafting another unproven rookie improve that situation? We need a veteran who, if need be, can start week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people keep talking about drafting a QB as a solution to our QB depth situation?

Right now, our QB stable has a cumulative total of 7 NFL games and some change. How will drafting another unproven rookie improve that situation? We need a veteran who, if need be, can start week 1.

I tend to agree.

Unless a guy fell into our lap and was clearly the BPA, I am not keen on taking a QB early.

We have Moore....very young. Why would you want a young guy that you hopefully are making your starter...backed up by a rookie.

We end up like Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people keep talking about drafting a QB as a solution to our QB depth situation?

Right now, our QB stable has a cumulative total of 7 NFL games and some change. How will drafting another unproven rookie improve that situation? We need a veteran who, if need be, can start week 1.

I hear this guy named Jake Delhomme is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seneca wallace is now a brown, so maybe one of the qb's from the cleveland stable is going to be shipped out of town. i am a moore backer and want him to start. he still needs another wr to help make his and smitty's life easier, but a veteran backup would make me feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Me, signing up for FanDuel Network, and then canceling FanDuel Network:
    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
×
×
  • Create New...